Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Actuarial Jobs by State

New York  New Jersey  Connecticut  Massachusetts 
California  Florida  Texas  Illinois  Colorado


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3121  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:22 AM
BernieSanders2016 BernieSanders2016 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redprinceton View Post
"Always on" starts to make me have concern for the privacy of the officers to be honest.
They don't have to be public servants if they don't want to.
Reply With Quote
  #3122  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:22 AM
redprinceton's Avatar
redprinceton redprinceton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieSanders2016 View Post
They don't have to be public servants if they don't want to.
You could say that about pretty much everything.
Reply With Quote
  #3123  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:26 AM
BernieSanders2016 BernieSanders2016 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redprinceton View Post
You could say that about pretty much everything.
But I'm not saying it about pretty much everything, I'm saying it about having video proof of the actions police officers take because it has been shown in the past that even when there is body camera evidence, the testimony the officer provides does not always match that video evidence. Whether this is purposefully false testimony or just the inherent issue with human memory, the justice system is too important to not take these steps to make sure we get the facts straight.
Reply With Quote
  #3124  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:31 AM
redprinceton's Avatar
redprinceton redprinceton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieSanders2016 View Post
But I'm not saying it about pretty much everything, I'm saying it about having video proof of the actions police officers take because it has been shown in the past that even when there is body camera evidence, the testimony the officer provides does not always match that video evidence. Whether this is purposefully false testimony or just the inherent issue with human memory, the justice system is too important to not take these steps to make sure we get the facts straight.
I agree that cameras can be extremely effective in this regard.

But the good they can do has to be weighted against privacy and liberty.

Last edited by redprinceton; 07-17-2017 at 11:35 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3125  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:39 AM
redprinceton's Avatar
redprinceton redprinceton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,401
Default

Sarbanes-Oxley can be effective at exposing, preventing, or minimizing malfeasance on the part of publicly traded companies.

Having worked in financial reporting though, I can tell you that SOX cannot catch everything.

Recording the conversations of everyone involved in reporting at all times could possibly be more effective. As a competent and ethical actuary though, I'm not really in favor of this.

I understand that financial malfeasance and gunning down an innocent civilian aren't the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #3126  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:42 AM
twig93's Avatar
twig93 twig93 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieSanders2016 View Post
Officer: "And then the yoga instructor went in to the Warrior 2 pose, which we took as a threat and feared for our lives."
I'd if the whole situation didn't make me .
__________________
Originally Posted by Gandalf
The thing that is clearest is twig's advice
Reply With Quote
  #3127  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:47 AM
BernieSanders2016 BernieSanders2016 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twig93 View Post
I'd if the whole situation didn't make me .
Reply With Quote
  #3128  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:50 AM
whisper's Avatar
whisper whisper is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Favorite beer: Hefewizen
Posts: 33,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redprinceton View Post
Recording the conversations of everyone involved in reporting at all times could possibly be more effective. As a competent and ethical actuary though, I'm not really in favor of this.
Would you consider it acceptable that any material related to the financial close be subject to the determination of the people working on the close to determine if said document is worthy of retaining or not - and no consequences were the people destroyed documents that they felt weren't worthy of retaining - especially when something seems to be questionable?
Reply With Quote
  #3129  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:55 AM
redprinceton's Avatar
redprinceton redprinceton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,401
Default

I want to make it clear that if i had to place a bet today, I would bet on the police being wrong here. That being said,

From what I can tell, the only reason why this woman is being assessed as, "not a threat", is because the photo the media is publishing has her all sunshine and smiles. Exposing a modest amount of cleavage, and enticing you to come to her hippie meditation seminar.

The publicized photo of Michael Brown in the early goings was similarly non-threatening. It was a picture of him in a cap and gown.
Reply With Quote
  #3130  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:59 AM
Hello, My Baby's Avatar
Hello, My Baby Hello, My Baby is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redprinceton View Post
"Always on" starts to make me have concern for the privacy of the officers to be honest.
They're on the job though. We don't really have much of an expectation of privacy at our jobs. Every byte that you send across your company network is known to the company
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas66Kent View Post
I'm probably one of the few normal well adjusted people on here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.19016 seconds with 12 queries