

FlashChat  Actuarial Discussion  Preliminary Exams  CAS/SOA Exams  Cyberchat  Around the World  Suggestions 
Browse Open Actuarial Jobs 
ERM Exam Old Advanced Finance and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Forum 

Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#121




For the INV track, can anyone explain the inflation duration/exposure of COLA/NONCOLA and by retired/Active?
How would a NON COLA plan for retirees have a higher inflation duration than COLA plan? If there is no cola, then wouldn't higher inflation reduce the liability? 
#122




For the ILA extension reading Hedging for Liabilities in Life Insurance Companies (reading 41317), there's an example of deltahedging a liability using a 3month futures contract. When calculating the futures price for both the base value and the 1% shock value, the authors determine the value as 10 * Stock Index * e^(rt) (well, 99% times that value for the 1% shock.)
I understand what they're doing except for the factor of 10. Can anyone explain why we need to multiply this value by 10. My only thought would be that maybe we're hedging 10 units of the underlying liability, but nowhere in the reading does it indicate that. Last edited by CubsPhan; 02152018 at 01:41 PM.. 
#123




Quote:
__________________
You've cat to be kitten me right meow. 
#124




Does anyone have any experience with the PAK practice question sets? Thinking of purchasing to complement my studying leading up to the exam. There is a 900+ practice question set and a 110+ mock question set. Any idea what the difference is and if one is better than the other?

#125




Quote:
Inflation duration is the change in liability with respect to the change in inflation. With COLA, our liability is something like... Liability = (1+inflation)*CF / (1+r) BUT, our interest rates are dependent on inflation. If inflation goes up, our discount rate goes up. We can rewrite (1+r) as (1+inflation)(1+real rates), where real rates won't change with inflation. So our formula becomes... Liability = (1+inflation)*CF / [(1+inflation)(1+real rates)] or... Liability = CF / (1+real rates) If inflation changes, how much does our liability change? Since inflation is no longer in the formula, the answer is 0! So, the liability isn't affected by inflation, because the increase in the numerator (payments) is offset by the increase in the denominator (discount). We'll call this, then, zero duration. Without COLA we just take the inflation out of the numerator. Liability = CF / [(1+inflation)(1+real rates)] Now, if inflation goes up, our liability goes down, because the denominator is larger. And, just like we would see with bonds, when rates go up and values go down, we have positive duration. So, similarly in this situation, we have positive inflation duration. Hopefully that helps! I'd be happy to put together an example if that would help.
__________________
Paul  CFE/SDM/ERM Online Seminar Instructor www.pakstudymanual.com PAK Study Manual Packages/Seminars for CFE/SDM/ERM Spring 2018 SDM: Sample CFE: Sample ERM: Sample Last edited by PaulP; 02162018 at 09:30 AM.. 
#126




Quote:
This has come up on the exam before (where the SOA's solution assumed 100 units per contract). Since there is no fixed rule clearly laid out, they are pretty forgiving, as long as you show what you are assuming.
__________________
Paul  CFE/SDM/ERM Online Seminar Instructor www.pakstudymanual.com PAK Study Manual Packages/Seminars for CFE/SDM/ERM Spring 2018 SDM: Sample CFE: Sample ERM: Sample 
#127




Quote:

#128




Question on RAROC vs RARORAC.
ERM 119 defines RAROC as risk adjusted return / total capital and RARORAC as risk adjusted return / required capital. However, in the linkage with strategic planning article, they define RAROC as (PV(underwriting) + PV (inv income)) / PV(required capital). Is that not a contradiction? 
#129




ERM11914 is written by Milliman and the Risk Appetite article is written by Kailan Shang and Zhen Chen. Two different authors to begin with... so differences may arise.
Getting back to the concepts... there are 3 commonly used ratios that are related to each other. The two covered in the readings are RAROC and RARORAC. The 3rd is RORAC. The RAROC attempts to adjust the numerator of the equation by accounting for risk. Here you should use Capital in the denominator as per Milliman. RORAC stands for Return on Risk Adjusted Capital. This equation adjusts the denominator by accounting for risk. Here you would use Required Capital in the denominator (but this is not testable and is presented here for completeness). The RARORAC formula adjusts both the numerator and denominator in the equation and gives us the Risk Adjusted Return on Risk Adjusted Capital. Here we would use Required Capital in the denominator. The issue is that RAROC can also be defined as Expected Return over Economic Capital. Here you could argue (if your required capital components are set using economic capital methods), that the Risk Appetite formula is also correct. With all this being said, I don't think that the graders could penalize you on a RAROC question if you argued to use Capital instead of Required Capital. If the question gives you one set of capital figures, then assume that the capital given is the denominator. If the question gives you both Capital and Required capital, then it would likely be referring to the ERM119 reading.
__________________
Clayton Zaluski, FSA, FCIA, CERA XP Actuarial www.xpactuarial.com CFE Samples: Study Manual Video of the Week ERM Samples: Study Manual SDM Samples: Study Manual 
#130




Quote:

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

