Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Short-Term Actuarial Math
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Salary Surveys
Property & Casualty, Life, Health & Pension

Health Actuary Jobs
Insurance & Consulting jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows

Actuarial Recruitment
Visit DW Simpson's website for more info.
www.dwsimpson.com/about

Casualty Jobs
Property & Casualty jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows


Short-Term Actuarial Math Old Exam C Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #161  
Old 12-07-2018, 01:09 PM
ActuariallyDecentAtBest ActuariallyDecentAtBest is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The412Kid View Post
I second this for the most part. In my experience, TIA was great for everything other than conceptual short-term insurance questions, which were total crapshoots for me on the actual exam. I thought the computational short-term stuff between TIA and the new SOA problems prepared me just fine. Also @ashleymarp, I plan on posting a breakdown of my studying on the February 2019 thread soon to shed some additional light since I know this exam is still a major unknown for a lot of people.
Yes, computational-wise it was pretty good for me. Should've been more specific. I think concept-wise it could've been better. Overall, Dave is awesome. Dude helped me pass my first exam (P,) so I bow down to the GOAT.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 12-07-2018, 08:54 PM
ashleymarp ashleymarp is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2016
College: UCSD Alumni
Posts: 81
Default

Thanks everyone for the input, looks like I'll be in adapt mode for a bit. @the412kid I will keep an eye out for your post.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 12-08-2018, 04:52 PM
noone noone is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ActuariallyDecentAtBest View Post
TIA has some SOA questions mixed into their practice questions. Those helped me out. I actually didn't even touch the SOA 300 or whatever haha. I didn't touch the TIA exams either. KD24 has it right though - SOA questions and ADAPT are probably your best tools for studying.
The SOA problems are included in Adapt and TIA in their entirety; so no reason to use both.

I have used TIA for 5 exams and found them very useful. I like the TIA lessons more than CA. For the short term stuff, Adapt has way more problems but I personally did not find this part of the exam challenging. I do like to add a 30 day Adapt sub right before the exam.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 12-09-2018, 03:02 PM
SweepingRocks SweepingRocks is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
College: Bentley University
Posts: 57
Default

Anyone know when scores will be out?
__________________
FM P MFE Sat for STAM in October [Confident]

Former Disney World Cast Member, currently no idea what I'm doing
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 12-09-2018, 07:39 PM
dogbite1337 dogbite1337 is offline
SOA
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
College: University of Wisconsin- Platteville
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweepingRocks View Post
Anyone know when scores will be out?
Tomorrow yo
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 12-10-2018, 10:16 AM
ch1rontl34 ch1rontl34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 144
Default

My score is now updated in my transcript, in case anyone else is wondering when that will happen.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 12-14-2018, 11:30 AM
ActuariallyDecentAtBest ActuariallyDecentAtBest is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 163
Default

So, only a 43.2% passing rate this time. Looks a little bit lower than previous sessions.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 12-14-2018, 03:06 PM
therealsylvos's Avatar
therealsylvos therealsylvos is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 16,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweepingRocks View Post
Dumb conceptual question: Do the parallelogram and extension of exposures method result in the same outcome when bringing premium to the current rate level?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bedford View Post
No. The parallelogram method is a rough approximation while the extension of exposures is precise. The extension of exposures method re-rates each historic exposure using the current rating algorithm and factors while the parallelogram method adjusts each by the average change for the group (year).
Obviously a bit late, but just want to add one thing to James' answer. Parallelogram method will produce the exact same outcome as Extention of Exposures in the special case when all of it's assumptions are fully valid. In the real world this is never the case, but sometimes it's close enough to produce a passable result. I imagine a good conceptual exam question would revolve around the assumptions implicit in the parallelogram method and what constitutes a severe violation such that you shouldn't rely on it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ao fan View Post
i like laying in the tube and pretending that i'm dead.

Last edited by therealsylvos; 12-14-2018 at 03:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.31595 seconds with 10 queries