Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Careers - Employment > Resume & Cover Letter Advice Forum
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Search Actuarial Jobs by State @ DWSimpson.com:
AL AK AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA
ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NH NJ NM NY NV NC ND
OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2016, 12:11 PM
BlackFox13 BlackFox13 is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Studying for first actuarial job
Posts: 58
Default Career Changer Resume Critique Request

Hi AO members, any input/advice on my resume would be greatly appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Joe Jobseeker.pdf (14.1 KB, 75 views)
__________________
P/1 FM/2 MFE/3F C/4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2016, 04:38 PM
vjvj's Avatar
vjvj vjvj is online now
Note Contributor
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: IL
Studying for MFE
Posts: 7,295
Default

The first bullet is really long and hard to read. There's no need to mention Company X in a Company X bullet imo. Will "spares process" be clear when you see the company or job title? I can make a guess, but it's not clear without them. The part where you "provide accuracy" is really awkward wording.

The 3rd bullet is inconsistent with the rest in that it doesn't start with a verb.

You don't need the "responsible for". You can just say you actually did that instead. I believe it also made you think you had to write in present tense, even though "responsible for" could imply either the verb "is" or "was". And "responsible for" is inconsistent with the other bullets in the section.

And the tense may not be bad except that you start the next bullet with the ambiguous word "Process". It is not ambiguous in past tense.

1st job 1 bullet is also inconsistent with the others. Adding "as requested per customer" doesn't make the bullet stronger.

I'd abbreviate B.A. so the major sticks out a little more.

There's no need for the hyphen after "in". I'd get rid of "Microsoft".

I'd not bother with the part about references. It goes without saying.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2016, 07:57 PM
BlackFox13 BlackFox13 is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Studying for first actuarial job
Posts: 58
Default

Thanks a lot for your time and input.
__________________
P/1 FM/2 MFE/3F C/4
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
advice, critique, resume

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.18176 seconds with 12 queries