|
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
11-09-2018, 06:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Should I offset exposures or premium in Frequency GLM?
I'm working on a frequency GLM and wondering if I should use exposures or premium as the offset in my model. I've run both and getting different results, i.e. certain variables are significant in one but not the other. How can I explain the difference?
__________________
|
|
#2
11-09-2018, 08:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is not advice - I am not a P&C actuary. I am just curious.
What is reason to use premium as an offset? If premium is in the offset wouldn't your model already be accouting for all the variables already in the manual rate (which may make sense if you want to determine how much to change the manual) but with an exposure offset none of that is yet accounted for? Does it work differently than that?
__________________
i always post when i'm in a shitty mood. if i didn't do that, i'd so rarely post. --AO Fan Lucky for you I was raised by people with a good moral center because if that were not the case, you guys would be in a lot of trouble. So be very, very glad people like me exist. Your future basically depends on it. --jas66kent The stock market is going to go up significantly due to Trump Economics --jas66kent
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
https://www.dwsimpson.com/register
Linear Mode
