![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
I work for a small company that provides fruad solutions to financial instions (big companies). My manager is open to the idea of supporting me through the actuarial exams. I just wanted to get some thoughts on whether the credentials would be applicable/beneficial. I passed the first couple of exams while working at a previous job. I find the actuarial educational path interesting and would like to get some thoughts. It definitely would be insurance. We do a lot of data mining and predictive modeling. Thanks for your help. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If, instead, you'd like to take exams and remain with your employer, I think that's a great idea, too, since you enjoy the work. But all of the issues you mentioned appear to remain, so this is less a question of whether the credentials will be applicable/beneficial. It's more a question of whether you've come to accept what you have and what you don't have at your present employer. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, a few things...
I do like what the actuarial exams have to offer. Admitedly, the last time I studied for one, it made me want to jump ship and get into a more traditional roll...to learn from other actuaries. I recently spoke with an FSA that said my current position may not be a bad place to be. And said that it may not be totally out in left field. As I work towards the credentials, I would be developing superb problem solving skills. Maybe I am off base, but when I look at an MBA program, I think, "not technical enough." When I look at a stats master's, I think, "not business enough." I'm I correct in believing that the actuarial exam provide a solid (in depth) mix? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|