Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Sports
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs

Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:48 PM
Examinator's Avatar
Examinator Examinator is offline
Note Contributor
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,870
Default Illini Mascot will no longer perform



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070216/...Rru3.t12sLMxIF

Quote:
URBANA, Ill. - The University of Illinois will retire its 81-year-old American Indian mascot, Chief Illiniwek, following the last men's home basketball game of the season on Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The NCAA in 2005 deemed the buckskin-clad Illiniwek an offensive use of American Indian imagery and barred the university from hosting postseason events.

American Indian groups and others complained for years that the mascot, used since 1926, is demeaning. Supporters of the mascot say it honors the contributions of American Indians to Illinois.

Illinois still will be able to use the name Illini because it's short for Illinois and the school can use the term Fighting Illini, because it's considered a reference to the team's competitive spirit, school officials said. It is unclear if the school will get a new mascot.

"This is an extremely emotional day for people on both sides of the issue, but the decision announced today ends a two-decade-long struggle surrounding Chief Illiniwek on this campus," said athletic director Ron Guenther.

"Personally, as an alumnus and former athlete, I am disappointed. However, as an administrator, I understand the decision that had to be made."

School officials said they received a letter from the NCAA on Thursday that said the school will no longer be banned from hosting postseason events if it drops the mascot and related American Indian imagery. The NCAA's sanctions thus far have prevented Illinois from hosting postseason events in two low-profile sports.

"The Chief Illiniwek tradition inspired and thrilled members of the University of Illinois community for 80 years," board of trustees chairman Lawrence Eppley said Friday. "It was created, carried on and enjoyed by people with great respect for tradition, and we appreciate their dedication and commitment. It will be important now to ensure the accurate recounting and safekeeping of the tradition as an integral part of the history of the university."

On Friday, a Champaign County Circuit Court judge rejected two students' request for a court order banning the university from "capitulating to the NCAA by announcing the retirement of Chief Illiniwek."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:55 PM
Loner's Avatar
Loner Loner is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Third Half
Posts: 33,381
Default

Seems to me specific names should be acceptable. It's stuff like "Redskins" that is offensive. I wonder if the various schools and teams had dropped Redskins-type names and mascots back when people started protesting them, this sort of mascot would have been an issue.
__________________
2012 AO Rap Battle Champion
Co-Legend of the Water Cooler(TM)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:55 PM
Pseudolus's Avatar
Pseudolus Pseudolus is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: galumphing towards Bethlehem
Favorite beer: Four Loko
Posts: 52,542
Default

Quote:
URBANA, Ill. - The University of Illinois will retire its 81-year-old American Indian mascot, Chief Illiniwek, following the last men's home basketball game of the season on Wednesday.
Hey, the guy's 81. He's earned it. What's the pension plan like for mascots, anyway?
__________________
Wunderkind emeritus
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:58 PM
Griffin 1's Avatar
Griffin 1 Griffin 1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against me.
Favorite beer: Grizzly. No, wait - polar bears.
Posts: 10,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loner View Post
Seems to me specific names should be acceptable. It's stuff like "Redskins" that is offensive. I wonder if the various schools and teams had dropped Redskins-type names and mascots back when people started protesting them, this sort of mascot would have been an issue.
You must be new to this planet.
__________________
I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:10 PM
Examinator's Avatar
Examinator Examinator is offline
Note Contributor
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,870
Default

I think we should ban absolutely everything that has any potential whatsoever to be offensive. Then we should ban all the inoffensive stuff, because otherwise we'd be discriminating.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:22 PM
Loner's Avatar
Loner Loner is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Third Half
Posts: 33,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffin 1 View Post
You must be new to this planet.
Well, for example, I thought the Seminoles were not bothered by the team of the same name.
__________________
2012 AO Rap Battle Champion
Co-Legend of the Water Cooler(TM)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:52 PM
Griffin 1's Avatar
Griffin 1 Griffin 1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against me.
Favorite beer: Grizzly. No, wait - polar bears.
Posts: 10,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loner View Post
Well, for example, I thought the Seminoles were not bothered by the team of the same name.
Some are.
__________________
I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2007, 08:57 PM
Pseudolus's Avatar
Pseudolus Pseudolus is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: galumphing towards Bethlehem
Favorite beer: Four Loko
Posts: 52,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffin 1 View Post
Quote:
The proud Seminole Nation also appears to support the *******ization of its name. T-shirts and sweatshirts at the football games all display the word “Noles” instead of Seminoles. Do tribal members now call themselves 'Noles?'
Do actual tropical storms call themselves 'Canes? Do residents of the New York Metropolitian area call themselves "Mets" (or, for that matter, "Yankees")?
__________________
Wunderkind emeritus
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2007, 09:03 PM
Griffin 1's Avatar
Griffin 1 Griffin 1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against me.
Favorite beer: Grizzly. No, wait - polar bears.
Posts: 10,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudolus View Post
Do actual tropical storms call themselves 'Canes?
"'Canes" is offensive because it is a derogatory term which at one time referred to slaves who worked in the sugar cane fields.
__________________
I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2007, 09:07 PM
DoctorNo's Avatar
DoctorNo DoctorNo is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudolus View Post
Do actual tropical storms call themselves 'Canes? Do residents of the New York Metropolitian area call themselves "Mets" (or, for that matter, "Yankees")?
I've always been a Knickerbocker fan myself. Go Knickers!
__________________
The opinions of Doctor No do not necessarily represent the opinions of mathematicians or consulting actuaries. Facts cited by Doctor No are not necessarily facts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.34620 seconds with 7 queries