Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of D.W. Simpson & Co.
Lindsey Nelson, Becki Tobia, Angie Wachholz, Diane Vanik, Katherine Hays
Alex Babic, Paul Castro, Steve Davis, Lesley Traverso, Tom Troceen, James Lecoutre
Aaron Benton, K.C. Cho, Patty Jacobsen, Dave Simpson, Bob Morand, Dave Retford, Carol Datu
Maureen Matous, R. Hicks, Marianne Westphal, Kim Skora, Kristyn Sakelaris, Ellen Hoppenjan
James Gardner, Lorraine Cully, Sarah Cleveland, Bethany Rave, Amy Trapp, David Benton, Jennifer Retford
Dan Karrow, Ginger Hassler, Rhonda Glick, Bryan Duffy, Derek Mulder, Barclay Burns, Barb Rave
Chris Hicks, Valorie Etheridge, Tom Munar, Julie Garwood, Margit Vogele


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2007, 12:45 AM
ShebaPoe ShebaPoe is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY / Palm Beach
Posts: 23,441
Default Halliburton moving to Dubai

The oil services powerhouse is moving out of the USA. I suppose the business climate of Dubai is better than ours?



BBC news

Halliburton plans move to Dubai

Halliburton, the oil services company formerly headed by US Vice-President Dick Cheney, is moving its headquarters from Texas to Dubai.
The company said it hoped the move to the United Arab Emirates would help it expand its business in the Middle East.

Halliburton won valuable contracts in Iraq following the US-led invasion of 2003, some of which were awarded without competitive bidding.

The company also has extensive operations in Saudi Arabia.

The oil giant will keep an office in Houston but the posts of chairman, president and chief executive will be based in Dubai.

Chief Executive Dave Lesar, speaking at a conference in Bahrain, confirmed that he would be relocating.

"As the CEO, I'm responsible for the global business of Halliburton in both hemispheres and I will continue to spend quite a bit of time in an airplane as I remain attentive to our customers, shareholders and employees around the world," he said.

"Yes, I will spend the majority of my time in Dubai."

In 2006, Halliburton made profits of $2.3bn on revenues of $22.6bn. Last month it announced a 40% decline in fourth-quarter profit.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...ss/6440365.stm
__________________
The beast of the Southeast. T.M.G.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2007, 07:49 AM
Guerilla poster's Avatar
Guerilla poster Guerilla poster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In Griffin's Neighborhood
Posts: 45,218
Default

Dubai makes some sense, it is more in the center of our new global corporate universe. It wouldn't surprise me that other global companies consider such a move in the future, as the connections, to Asia and Europe and US, are much more centralized. Plus, CEO types would like Dubai, it is great place for someone with alot of money.
__________________
"It makes no difference who you vote for — the two parties are really one party representing four percent of the people."

GORE VIDAL (RIP)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2007, 08:33 AM
General Apathy's Avatar
General Apathy General Apathy is offline
Revered
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: St. Kitts
Studying for the Beach
Favorite beer: Carib
Posts: 28,708
Default

They have that cool hotel too
__________________
***k Juan

Spoiler:


]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:45 AM
Triweasel's Avatar
Triweasel Triweasel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nut Heaven
Posts: 9,787
Default

and i hear Michael Jackson has set up a babysitting service, so your kids are all taken care of.
__________________
Spidurman [observer]: tri = temptation incarnate
DblDownTrent: shoulda invested in my luck - always listen to tri
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:49 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Makes perfect business sense...the US hasn't been building or upgrading refineries, and it doesn't look like anyone will start again any time soon. Better to get boots on the ground in the part of the world where their consulting is most in demand.

Hopefully they'll do a better job for their Middle Eastern clients than they have for the US military.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:51 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I heard that Dick Cheney owns stock in Halliburton that can be cashed in after he leaves office.

Anyone know if that's true?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:53 AM
MountainHawk's Avatar
MountainHawk MountainHawk is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, MA
Studying for Nothing!!!!
College: Lehigh University Alum
Favorite beer: Yuengling
Posts: 55,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uma Karuna View Post
I heard that Dick Cheney owns stock in Halliburton that can be cashed in after he leaves office.

Anyone know if that's true?
While in office, this assets are operated in a blind trust. I'm sure he had shares of Halliburton going into office, but only the person operating the trust should know what assets he currently has.
__________________


"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson

It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in. -- Elizabeth May

???? Jan 20: Freedom for the Bill of Rights

1 2
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:54 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainHawk View Post
While in office, this assets are operated in a blind trust. I'm sure he had shares of Halliburton going into office, but only the person operating the trust should know what assets he currently has.
So it's possible that, assuming that the shares would have grown in value due to US government contracts in Iraq, Cheney will have personally profited from the war via this stock?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2007, 12:07 PM
MountainHawk's Avatar
MountainHawk MountainHawk is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, MA
Studying for Nothing!!!!
College: Lehigh University Alum
Favorite beer: Yuengling
Posts: 55,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uma Karuna View Post
So it's possible that, assuming that the shares would have grown in value due to US government contracts in Iraq, Cheney will have personally profited from the war via this stock?
Yes, but I believe it's illegal for him to know what is in his investment portfolio, so he (theoretically) has no way of knowing he'll profit when making that decision.
__________________


"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson

It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in. -- Elizabeth May

???? Jan 20: Freedom for the Bill of Rights

1 2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2007, 12:26 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainHawk View Post
Yes, but I believe it's illegal for him to know what is in his investment portfolio, so he (theoretically) has no way of knowing he'll profit when making that decision.
Assuming that the trustee is bound to operate in a manner advantageous to Cheney, I think it's safe to say that he knows damn well he's very likely to personally profit if Halliburton benefits from the war. That is, we can assume that, given Halliburton is doing well, the trustee would have no incentive to divest those shares.

Am I being overly cynical?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.23428 seconds with 7 queries