Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Non-Actuarial Topics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet Kristyn Sakelaris, Senior Manager at DW Simpson

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:33 PM
zeroEthix zeroEthix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,075
Default Help me understand R^2, Correlation, and Causality



I have an array of data and the R^2 is .2632 and the correlation is .5130. I ran other tests and found that correlation tends to be larger than R^2.

What's the relationship between these two and how is causality involved??

This is pure maths masturbation in Excel.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:38 PM
asdfasdf's Avatar
asdfasdf asdfasdf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: My perception of reality
Studying for nication
Posts: 20,079
Default

correlation is the square root of r^2. And correlation does not imply causality.
__________________
Your own conciousness blinds you to the true existence of all things external to it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:43 PM
Elisha's Avatar
Elisha Elisha is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Favorite beer: Guiness or another quality Micro/Import
Posts: 4,787
Default

While we're at it, can someone refresh my mind on multi-collinearity as well? I think that is where you have several same-like x-variables in a multiple regression (e.g. using 1Q06 and 2006).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:47 PM
zeroEthix zeroEthix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,075
Default

I knew it was easy

So R=Correlation
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2007, 09:25 PM
asdfasdf's Avatar
asdfasdf asdfasdf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: My perception of reality
Studying for nication
Posts: 20,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elisha View Post
While we're at it, can someone refresh my mind on multi-collinearity as well? I think that is where you have several same-like x-variables in a multiple regression (e.g. using 1Q06 and 2006).
I'm a little hazy, I'm remembering something from course 7, in a multiple linear regression model, you still only have one Y, but there are various x terms, you have to watch out because each x term you add will improve the model's r^2, but some of the x terms are inter-related, so you need to calculate an adjusted r^2 that adjusts against you to see if adding more x variables is really helping your model

(because if you have 10 data points, you can have a 9 variable equation that describes them, but that isn't as good for forecasting as a one variable equation)
__________________
Your own conciousness blinds you to the true existence of all things external to it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2007, 11:24 PM
Renaissance Man's Avatar
Renaissance Man Renaissance Man is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Studying for FROR
Posts: 1,009
Default

Multicollinearity means essentially highly correlated covariates. Neither hard to detect nor hard to resolve (except perhaps in poorly designed and collected data, but that's really a different problem).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-15-2007, 06:56 AM
horace goldfarb horace goldfarb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Favorite beer: Warsteiner Dunkel
Posts: 1,563
Default

Heteroskedasticity! Sorry, I couldn't help myself.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-15-2007, 07:20 AM
horace goldfarb horace goldfarb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Favorite beer: Warsteiner Dunkel
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asdfasdf View Post
(because if you have 10 data points, you can have a 9 variable equation that describes them, but that isn't as good for forecasting as a one variable equation)
Only if there is some single-parameter parametrization that describes the behavior of the data. If your 9 parameters aren't multi-collinear, that may not be the case.

Last edited by horace goldfarb; 03-15-2007 at 09:29 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-15-2007, 09:24 AM
celery's Avatar
celery celery is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: in the Poker Posse
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroEthix View Post
This is pure maths masturbation in Excel.
Forgive me for asking a stupid question, but how does the bolded term relate to pure mathematics? Isn't it more applied than pure?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-15-2007, 09:48 AM
Chief Petosky's Avatar
Chief Petosky Chief Petosky is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Location: Location
Favorite beer: BBC Bourbon Stout
Posts: 9,229
Default

There are no stupid questions ... only stupid answers ... except in this thread, where all the answers are brilliant. I have to hand it to you all for a job well done.
__________________
Look into the skillet
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.36818 seconds with 7 queries