![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have an array of data and the R^2 is .2632 and the correlation is .5130. I ran other tests and found that correlation tends to be larger than R^2. What's the relationship between these two and how is causality involved?? This is pure maths masturbation in Excel. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
correlation is the square root of r^2. And correlation does not imply causality.
__________________
Your own conciousness blinds you to the true existence of all things external to it. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
While we're at it, can someone refresh my mind on multi-collinearity as well? I think that is where you have several same-like x-variables in a multiple regression (e.g. using 1Q06 and 2006).
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I knew it was easy
So R=Correlation |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(because if you have 10 data points, you can have a 9 variable equation that describes them, but that isn't as good for forecasting as a one variable equation)
__________________
Your own conciousness blinds you to the true existence of all things external to it. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heteroskedasticity! Sorry, I couldn't help myself.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only if there is some single-parameter parametrization that describes the behavior of the data. If your 9 parameters aren't multi-collinear, that may not be the case.
Last edited by horace goldfarb; 03-15-2007 at 09:29 AM.. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Forgive me for asking a stupid question, but how does the bolded term relate to pure mathematics? Isn't it more applied than pure?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are no stupid questions ... only stupid answers ... except in this thread, where all the answers are brilliant. I have to hand it to you all for a job well done.
__________________
Look into the skillet |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|