Quote:
Originally Posted by Potato2007
Jason, I agree with you, but how would you explain the part in red in my question 1?
|
Ah! I apologize for overlooking that when I read your post. Both are correct, it just depends on what we consider

to be. In the text, everywhere in this section that you see

replace it by

so that the formula reads
)
is
 + (\beta- 0.5\sigma^2)t, \sigma^2t\bigr))
. Now set

and we obtain the ASM Manual's formula for the distribution of the natural logarithm of stock prices.
The point is that on page 655 of the text, the author is discussing general geometric Brownian motion with drift

. For a stock, a special case of geometric Brownian motion, the drift is

where

is the expected return on the stock and

is the continuous dividend rate. The author of that text should not have used

to refer to the drift and to refer to the expected return on the stock.