Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > MFE
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

US HEALTH ACTUARIAL JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2007, 10:59 PM
Potato2007 Potato2007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 34
Default ASM Quiz 15.2

1. For Geometric Brownian motion, (20.12) in page 655 of textbook gives
Ln[X(t)]~N{ln[X(0)]+(α - 0.5σ^2)t, σ^2 t}, while ASM gives
Ln[S(t)/S(0)]~N{(α - δ - 0.5σ^2)t, σ^2 t}.
Are they equivalent?

2. For ASM Quiz 15.2, shouldn't the mean be equal to (0.1-0.05^2)*5, instead of 0.1*5 as in the manual?

Last edited by Potato2007; 04-19-2007 at 11:24 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:18 PM
jason. jason. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Studying for CFA II
Favorite beer: Samuel Smith Old Brewery Pale Ale
Posts: 888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Potato2007 View Post
1. For Geometric Brownian motion, (20.12) in page 655 of textbook gives Ln[X(t)]~N{ln[X(0)]+(α - 0.5σ^2)t, σ^2 t}, while ASM manual gives Ln[S(t)/S(0)]~N{(α - δ - 0.5σ^2)t, σ^2 t}. Are they equivalent?
Yes, because if is then is . Since the result follows.

Quote:
2. For ASM Quiz 15.2, shouldn't the mean be equal to (0.1-0.05^2)*5, instead of 0.1*5 given in the manual?
Yes. At least the author was consistent in making this error throughout that chapter.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:26 PM
Potato2007 Potato2007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Jason, I agree with you, but how would you explain the part in red in my question 1?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:42 PM
jason. jason. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Studying for CFA II
Favorite beer: Samuel Smith Old Brewery Pale Ale
Posts: 888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Potato2007 View Post
Jason, I agree with you, but how would you explain the part in red in my question 1?
Ah! I apologize for overlooking that when I read your post. Both are correct, it just depends on what we consider to be. In the text, everywhere in this section that you see replace it by so that the formula reads is . Now set and we obtain the ASM Manual's formula for the distribution of the natural logarithm of stock prices.

The point is that on page 655 of the text, the author is discussing general geometric Brownian motion with drift . For a stock, a special case of geometric Brownian motion, the drift is where is the expected return on the stock and is the continuous dividend rate. The author of that text should not have used to refer to the drift and to refer to the expected return on the stock.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:59 PM
Potato2007 Potato2007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Thank you! You will pass the exam.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.29146 seconds with 7 queries