![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
| CAS 3 - specific material Please keep posts regarding material common to both exams in the upper forum |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please help me out on this....
Why critical region is X<= C, but not X>= C , because for type I error, the significance level is 2%. Isn't it x>=c for the significance level??? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
the critical region IS X>c, where c=30 accidents... they want to make sure that 98% of the sample falls below this 30 accident mark
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh,,,,,,, i see,, thank you so much,, good luck on your exam!!!
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Preface: YugoHugo beat me, but here's the post anyway =0
piemedia, the definition of a Type I Error is P(Reject H0|H0 is true). The null hypothesis in this question is that the proportion of customers who file at least one claim, p, equals 30% (p=30%). Since a discount will be offered if fewer than 30% file at least one claim, the alternative hypothesis is that p is less than 30%. Now just work from the definition, and note that the proportion X who file at least one claim has mean p and variance p(1-p). And, remember that the The rest, I hope, should follow.
__________________
a wonderful post Last edited by carrytheCrøss; 04-24-2007 at 04:47 PM.. Reason: Meant 'proportion' |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|