Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Finance - Investments > Non-Actuarial Personal Finance/Investing
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson & Co
Worldwide Actuarial

Recruitment

Entry Level Jobs
Casualty, Health,

Life, Pension,
Investment --
Insurance / Consulting

Asian Jobs
Hong Kong, China, India, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Singapore,

Malaysia, and more

Registration Form
Be Notified of

New Actuarial Jobs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #501  
Old 06-11-2008, 02:13 PM
axjoke axjoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,479
Default

Eugene, would +29% on the year be considered beating the market?
Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 06-11-2008, 03:39 PM
zeroEthix zeroEthix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,073
Default

Shorts pay off this week?
Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 06-11-2008, 03:52 PM
axjoke axjoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroEthix View Post
Shorts pay off this week?
Yeah, several of them worked very well. On a dollar basis Lehman was the star. Not a huge recent swing.. maybe 6%.

Last edited by axjoke; 06-11-2008 at 03:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 06-11-2008, 07:31 PM
BanillyDad BanillyDad is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5
Default

It would be foolish to think the market can be beat in the long-term per se, but I certainly think a joe-actuary investor could, by taking a value investing approach, expect to beat the "market less investment expenses" return. Wall street investors think too heavily about short term returns that will yield them short-term bonuses or promotions. Therefore, you don't need to know more than "the market knows", you just need a different time horizon. If you have 50K to invest and are moderately informed, picking 15 stocks on a buy-and-hold strategy would have better prospects than a mutual fund with 1% or so yearly commissions doing the same thing. I'll take 0% commissions over 1%.
Reply With Quote
  #505  
Old 06-11-2008, 07:43 PM
Bubba Colbert's Avatar
Bubba Colbert Bubba Colbert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BanillyDad View Post
I'll take 0% commissions over 1%.
No one trades at 0%. And if you never sell then you never make a profit.

And buy and hold sounds good in theory, but I bet there are a few "blue chip" stocks that you might have named 10 years ago that haven't done too well.

And yes you can name some ok ones with hind sight, but 20/20 hindsight doesn't work for the future.

On top of that, there is often risk assumed with increased returns. It may be true that I can pick 10 stocks and most of the time the 10 stock portfolio will beat the market. But have I not assumed more risk in being less diversified with only 10 positions? What happens to my portfolio if one of my 10 positions turns out to be an Enron or Bear Stearns that looked good on paper when I implemented my buy and hold strategy?
Reply With Quote
  #506  
Old 06-11-2008, 09:41 PM
notreallyme's Avatar
notreallyme notreallyme is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Colbert View Post
No one trades at 0%.
I pay $10 per trade, that is pretty close to 0%. If you are only going to one number of accuaracy I would call it correct (i.e. 0.000% would not be correct but 0 can go from 0 to .49999....)

And I think there are some stocks you can buy direct where it really is 0% exactly. Not sure how that works exactly.
__________________
Only true outliers:

succeed without lots of work
fail in spite of hard work

(paraphased from Sheba)
Reply With Quote
  #507  
Old 06-13-2008, 06:54 PM
Bubba Colbert's Avatar
Bubba Colbert Bubba Colbert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notreallyme View Post
I pay $10 per trade, that is pretty close to 0%. If you are only going to one number of accuaracy I would call it correct (i.e. 0.000% would not be correct but 0 can go from 0 to .49999....)

And I think there are some stocks you can buy direct where it really is 0% exactly. Not sure how that works exactly.
Even if you think your transaction price is $10 per trade, there are still other hidden transaction costs. They make more money off of you by being market makers and the bid ask spread.
Reply With Quote
  #508  
Old 06-18-2008, 12:41 PM
axjoke axjoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,479
Default

Eugene... even though you wouldn't bet. I thought you would be interested in seeing how well BKUNA is doing these days. Down to $2.48 with a price target of $1 (FBR). Sadly it's not even worth that but some poor suckers will end up buying shares as BKUNA continues to create/dump them.

others of interest:

PMI 4.48
RDN 2.69
ABk 2.1
MBI 6.05 (only holding any value because of the cash they raised but refused to put into their insurance sub)

Financials still suck, book values are a joke... the market isn't that efficient.
Reply With Quote
  #509  
Old 06-18-2008, 12:59 PM
notreallyme's Avatar
notreallyme notreallyme is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axjoke View Post
Eugene, would +29% on the year be considered beating the market?

Obviously risk adjusted you have earned exactly the risk free rate - So no you have not beaten the market. Not even sure what that means but the textbook says it's true!

Maybe in Eugene's world that is all you are allowed to spend and vendors can not accept any dollars above that
__________________
Only true outliers:

succeed without lots of work
fail in spite of hard work

(paraphased from Sheba)
Reply With Quote
  #510  
Old 06-18-2008, 01:04 PM
notreallyme's Avatar
notreallyme notreallyme is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Colbert View Post
Even if you think your transaction price is $10 per trade, there are still other hidden transaction costs. They make more money off of you by being market makers and the bid ask spread.
Good point.

Wehn your mutual fund manager buys into the S&P does he pay the market spread? I really don't know, but there must be some costs.
__________________
Only true outliers:

succeed without lots of work
fail in spite of hard work

(paraphased from Sheba)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
i don't think, that fama is a, very rich man

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.19065 seconds with 8 queries