Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 4/C - Construction and Evaluation of Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson Global Actuarial Recruitment

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:35 PM
Of course Of course is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
Default Chi Squared

1000 random numbers in 20 categories. How many degrres of freedom you guys used? I wasn't sure between 19 and 20 but i picked 20...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:38 PM
Strategery's Avatar
Strategery Strategery is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Studying for FAC
Favorite beer: Yuengling
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Of course View Post
1000 random numbers in 20 categories. How many degrres of freedom you guys used? I wasn't sure between 19 and 20 but i picked 20...
19 I think. (# groups) - (# estimated parameters) - (1). You didn't estimate any parameters, so it's just 20-1 = 19. I don't believe it would be 20 under any circumstances. Someone call me out if I'm totally off on this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:40 PM
jadr jadr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 30
Default Anyone get E for that question?

I think it was E for the Chi-Squared, was that right? I just remember getting a statistic that was way larger than the values of that in the Chi-Square distribution table so you reject at all levels?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:42 PM
Strategery's Avatar
Strategery Strategery is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Studying for FAC
Favorite beer: Yuengling
Posts: 65
Default

Yes, now that you mention it I think I got E too. I know there was one Chi-Square problem where I rejected at all levels, so it might have been that one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:48 PM
ultfrisbee ultfrisbee is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Studying for those FAP modules
Posts: 798
Default

37 was my stat
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:51 PM
green_alien green_alien is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strategery View Post
Yes, now that you mention it I think I got E too. I know there was one Chi-Square problem where I rejected at all levels, so it might have been that one.
Is this the likelihood ratio test problem? I recall rejecting it all levels.
__________________
Think about it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2007, 06:00 PM
Strategery's Avatar
Strategery Strategery is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Studying for FAC
Favorite beer: Yuengling
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by green_alien View Post
Is this the likelihood ratio test problem? I recall rejecting it all levels.
Hmm, now I'm confused. For the likelihood ratio test, I'm almost certain I rejected at all levels....was there only 1 degree of freedom for that? That's what I assumed, and I rejected everywhere.

So maybe I rected at all levels for both of these problems, but for sure the likelihood ratio test. I was less confident in that answer though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-16-2007, 06:18 PM
green_alien green_alien is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strategery View Post
Hmm, now I'm confused. For the likelihood ratio test, I'm almost certain I rejected at all levels....was there only 1 degree of freedom for that? That's what I assumed, and I rejected everywhere.

So maybe I rected at all levels for both of these problems, but for sure the likelihood ratio test. I was less confident in that answer though.
I assumed that df = 1, as well and got a large answer that it had to be rejected at all levels. I guessed on the pseudo-U(0,1) problem, though.
__________________
Think about it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-16-2007, 08:54 PM
mreevit mreevit is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Of course View Post
1000 random numbers in 20 categories. How many degrres of freedom you guys used? I wasn't sure between 19 and 20 but i picked 20...
How the hell was this one done?

you're given 20 intervals with 1/20 * 1000 expected in each one. So you need the sum of (O-E)^2/E for 20 observations. the expected for each interval was the same so ...the test stat is

(Sum(O^2) -SUM(100*O) +20*20^2)/20


all of this can be figured out but the Sum(O)

How did you calculate this?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-16-2007, 09:00 PM
beck beck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mreevit View Post
How the hell was this one done?

you're given 20 intervals with 1/20 * 1000 expected in each one. So you need the sum of (O-E)^2/E for 20 observations. the expected for each interval was the same so ...the test stat is

(Sum(O^2) -SUM(100*O) +20*20^2)/20


all of this can be figured out but the Sum(O)

How did you calculate this?
i was wondering the same thing, the answer seemed to be JUST there, but i couldnt get it .....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.22220 seconds with 7 queries