The IRS had originally taken the position that section 264(f), which was written in response to Fannie Mae and others writing COLI on debtors, applied the adjustment to the proration rules to all life insurance company COLI, even that on employees. There was a fair amount of criticism of that position, particualrly given that Congressional intent seem to be only to apply the rules to non-employee COLI. This is a way to allow insurance companies to hold COLI on their employees while still providing that IRS was correct on the technical interpretation of the statute. At least thats how I read it.
Chris
|