Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs

Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2007, 05:46 PM
independent1019 independent1019 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 528
Question MLC sample question #46

Hi, I need some help with this question, it asks for the temporary life annuity-immediate on independent lives 30 and 40:
ILT, and 6%

I approached the problem by computing the temporary life annuity-due on (30) and (40) first, then subtracted 1 from it. Then I got 6.64, which is wrong according to the solution. I don't understand why it is wrong! The only difference between mine solution and their solution is they coverted everything to annuity immediate while they are solving the problem, but I used all immediate due values while solving the problem, and subtracted 1 at the end.

Can some one help?
__________________
Jealousy always work the opposite way.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2007, 06:32 PM
jraven's Avatar
jraven jraven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Studying for nothing!
College: Penn State
Posts: 1,262
Default

It depends which temporary annuity due you computed...

If you computed then
__________________
The Poisson distribution wasn't named after a fish -- it was named after a man ... who was named after a fish.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2007, 09:19 PM
independent1019 independent1019 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 528
Default

why do you have two formulas for the same annuity immediate??, I used the first one for the problem, and got the wrong answer?? I do not understand ur second equation
__________________
Jealousy always work the opposite way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2007, 09:31 PM
jraven's Avatar
jraven jraven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Studying for nothing!
College: Penn State
Posts: 1,262
Default

Until you say WHICH temporary annuity-due you computed I can't say why you were wrong. The point of my post was that subtracting 1 would only work if you had computed the 11-payment annuity-due. On the other hand, if you had computed the 10-payment annuity-due, then subtracting one does not give the correct answer, since subtracting 1 would leave you with the actuarial present value of a 9-payment annuity-immediate. You would then need to add in the 10th payment, which is why there is an endowment term in the second formula.

EDIT: Basically, when you were finding your temporary annuity-due, did you work out
or
?

EDIT2: Based of your stated answer of 6.64, I'm pretty sure you did the first one, which is . Which means that by subtracting one you ultimately calculated .
__________________
The Poisson distribution wasn't named after a fish -- it was named after a man ... who was named after a fish.

Last edited by jraven; 09-23-2007 at 10:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2007, 10:25 PM
independent1019 independent1019 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 528
Default

OHHHHH, I see!!! Thank you, I forgot that there is one more payment at time 10 that I forgot to take into account for the annuity immediate, that is not included with the ten year annuity due, so I will need to use the 11 year annuity due minus 1 to get the correct answer. Thank you!
__________________
Jealousy always work the opposite way.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2007, 10:53 PM
jraven's Avatar
jraven jraven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Studying for nothing!
College: Penn State
Posts: 1,262
Default

Yes, or you could take the first answer you got, which was , and add a payment at time 10 via a pure endowment:


Which differs from the given solution only because of the rounding in your value of .
__________________
The Poisson distribution wasn't named after a fish -- it was named after a man ... who was named after a fish.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:10 AM
slackmaster slackmaster is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7
Default

How is the value 10E 30:40 calculated in this problem? I imagine you find for each individual life, multiply together and then discount back 10 years? I am having trouble reaching the correct value. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:43 AM
colby2152's Avatar
colby2152 colby2152 is offline
Note Contributor
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Studying for FAP
College: PSU '07
Favorite beer: Oskar Blues Old Chub Scotch Ale
Posts: 4,171
Default

You can get that information either from a mortality table OR from given information in the problem.
__________________
How to explain actuarial exams to someone else...
Good Einstein quote - "One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind for the examinations, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.18232 seconds with 7 queries