|
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
United Kingdom | Canada
| Entry Level |
D.W. Simpson |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
10-10-2007, 10:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Brosius least squares and credibility formula
Are not the least squares version and the credibility version of the formula equal? If I recall from exam 4 correctly, it was shown they are equal. So why does Brosius say you should not use LS when changes are not random, but you should use the linear approx to Bayes when you get the same answer either way (assuming I'm right about them being the same)?
__________________
"When I started this clown thing, I thought it would be nothing but glory. You know, the glory of being a clown." "If I don't save the wee turtles, who will?" "I'd wager he has some variety of walking clock in that box." "Way to play the boss' head like a bongo, Homer!" "We need more Bort license plates in the gift shop. I repeat, we are sold out of Bort license plates." "I'm impressed you were able to write so legibly on your own butt." 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
