Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Risk Management
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Fill in a brief DW Simpson Registration Form
to be contacted when our jobs meet your criteria.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2007, 10:56 AM
kazh's Avatar
kazh kazh is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: a long nap
Favorite beer: A & W Root
Posts: 4,303
Lightbulb Few Insurers Have Strong ERM

Plenty of ERM work in the insurance industry ahead:
Quote:
S&P Exec Explains Ratings For ERM Practices New York--NU Online News Service, Dec. 17; 2007
Out of 125 insurers and reinsurers, only 5% fall into the “excellent” category for their enterprise risk management practices, while 84% are “adequate,” according to Standard & Poor’s, New York. ... “We would expect a strong ERM company to have control processes for some of their risk that will actually give them competitive advantage in an adverse situation,” he said.

Such a company “either would not be exposed to as many of the negative events that occur in its industry, or when those events happen, it would “not suffer as large a loss because they have some preparation for that,” Ingram explained.

What trips up many companies is the ability to do strategic risk management, or overall risk-reward tradeoff. This is something that in the insurance industry “is only practiced by a small fraction,” Ingram said.
...
Examples of “excellent” ERM companies include Genworth, Manulife and USAA, he said. ...He said that one company, Manulife, had a strong ERM program that was instrumental in moving the company to a Triple-A rating last year.
http://www.lifeandhealthinsurancenew...fe%20Insurance
__________________
awake again
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:22 AM
triplea's Avatar
triplea triplea is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Studying for Exam Committee
Posts: 4,922
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kazh View Post
S&P Exec Explains Ratings For ERM Practices New York--NU Online News Service, Dec. 17; 2007
Out of 125 insurers and reinsurers, only 5% fall into the “excellent” category for their enterprise risk management practices, while 84% are “adequate,” according to Standard & Poor’s, New York. ... “We would expect a strong ERM company to have control processes for some of their risk that will actually give them competitive advantage in an adverse situation,” he said.

Such a company “either would not be exposed to as many of the negative events that occur in its industry, or when those events happen, it would “not suffer as large a loss because they have some preparation for that,” Ingram explained.

What trips up many companies is the ability to do strategic risk management, or overall risk-reward tradeoff. This is something that in the insurance industry “is only practiced by a small fraction,” Ingram said.
...
Examples of “excellent” ERM companies include Genworth, Manulife and USAA, he said. ...He said that one company, Manulife, had a strong ERM program that was instrumental in moving the company to a Triple-A rating last year.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.14076 seconds with 7 queries