Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > General Actuarial
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

US PROPERTY AND CASUALTY JOBS

General Actuarial Non-Specific Actuarial Topics - Before posting a thread, please browse over our other sections to see if there is a better fit, such as Careers - Employment, Actuarial Science Universities Forum or any of our other 100+ forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2007, 06:02 PM
The Attractuary's Avatar
The Attractuary The Attractuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 66
Default Accident Year to Underwriting Year

I've searched the forum and I'm having a hard time understanding the explanations given so far.

I need to take AY losses, evaluated in 12-month intervals starting at month 12, and convert them to UY losses. I've seen three different people draw the parallelogram, but I have yet to get an explanation of the various lines mean, what the angles mean, etc. I've also heard a lot about "average accident date" and lagging development factors.

My general working theory so far is to take whatever the development factor is at the AY factor (say 12-24 period factor is 2.5). I figure out the difference between the AY average accident date (under some simple assumptions), and declare it to be 6 months. The difference between the average accident date and the AY evaluation date is 6 months. I take the UY average accident date (12 months) and then I say, the corresponding UY evaluation date is 18 months. The logic here, right or wrong (please correct), is that if 2.5 was the development factor when the AY was 12 months mature, or 6 months past its average accident date, then the same factor must apply to the UY when it is equivalently mature - i.e., at 18 months, 6 months more mature than its average accident date.

After that I do a linear interpolation to whatever date I want.

If this is a jumble, please either point me in the right direction or explain. If it's clear but wrong, please state why, although I'll settle for "That is wrong," so I know not to use it.

Thanks for any help anyone may have to offer on this subject!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2007, 09:31 PM
tommie frazier tommie frazier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Favorite beer: The kind with 2 e's
Posts: 19,259
Default

here's a link.

http://www.casact.org/pubs/dpp/dpp88/88dpp501.pdf

details within. good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.12807 seconds with 7 queries