Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

IMMEDIATE NEED - Solvency II Experts - Associate to Partner Level
Browse Solvency II jobs at www.DWSimpson.com/jobs/in/solvency-ii

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 05-21-2003, 05:51 PM
The Mad Hatter's Avatar
The Mad Hatter The Mad Hatter is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,978
Default

William Buckley gave a commencement address at my college years back and spent the whole time talking about how liberals and the media lost the war. No one shouted him down.

It is sad that on a day honoring graduation from a liberal arts college, the students can only demonstrate that they have learned nothing about intellectual discourse.

The response of the super patriots in the audience reminds of the Bush administration's response when Kofni asserted that the U.S. had invaded Iraq without Security Council authorization and should make sure to fulfill its obligations as an occupying force. The got all mad. Right now, the truth itself provokes an angry response.
__________________
Someone tells us that God loves us as a father loves his children. We are reassured. But then something awful happens. Some qualification is made.... We are reassured again. But then perhaps we ask: what is this assurance of God's (appropriately qualified) love worth, what is this apparent guarantee really a guarantee against? Just what would have to happen not merely (morally and wrongly) to tempt but also (logically and rightly) to entitle us to say "God does not love us" or even "God does not exist"?
-- Antony Flew
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-21-2003, 05:54 PM
Grace Grace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Brachowitz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melancholy Barbie
Repeatedly running to the plight of the Iraqi people when someone makes a comment about a war we engaged in for our own security, or about how that war will affect us now, is no less intellectually dishonest.
Well, when the criticism regards the post-war well-being of the Iraqi people, it does seem appropriate to point out their pre-war plight. Doesn't it?
It didn't regard the well-being of the Iraqis in this case, and often doesn't in others. The improved lot of the Iraqis also doesn't automatically trump any question of how this war was handled either.
It's absolutely appropriate to point it out when the criticism regards the post-war well-being of the Iraqi people, but depending on the context, it may or may not be all that meaningful to do so.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-21-2003, 06:01 PM
Dr T Non-Fan Dr T Non-Fan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Just outside of Nowhere
Posts: 59,703
Default

On what date did we decide that the Iraqi people's plight is more important than, say, the security of the American people?

We seem to be in more danger now, according to our own government's high-tech system.

Schools are for teaching and learning. The commencement speaker was teaching. He learned a lesson.
__________________
DTNF's Basic Philosophy Regarding Posting: There's no emoticon for what I'm feeling! -- Jeff Albertson (CBG)
DTNF's Trademarked Standard Career Advice: "pass some exams and get back to us."
DTNF's Major advice: "Doesn't matter. Choose major that helps you with goal of Career Advice."
DTNF's Résumé Advice: Have a good and interesting answer to every item on it for the interviews.
DTNF's Law of Job Offers: You not only have to qualify for the position, but you also have to be the best candidate available for the offer.
DTNF's Work Philosophy: I am actuary. Please insert data. -- Actuary Actuarying Rodriguez.
Twitches' Advice to Crazy Women: Please just go buy your 30 cats already.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-21-2003, 06:08 PM
Grace Grace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan
On what date did we decide that the Iraqi people's plight is more important than, say, the security of the American people?
On the day people started questioning whether GWII would lead to an improvement in the security of the American people.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-21-2003, 06:14 PM
Triweasel's Avatar
Triweasel Triweasel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nut Heaven
Posts: 9,856
Default

Wasn't that a couple of years ago?
__________________
Spidurman [observer]: tri = temptation incarnate
DblDownTrent: shoulda invested in my luck - always listen to tri
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 05-21-2003, 07:16 PM
E. Blackadder's Avatar
E. Blackadder E. Blackadder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Not far from US 1.
Favorite beer: Beer?! Blech. But Dad likes Dortmunder Union.
Posts: 20,837
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatter
William Buckley gave a commencement address at my college years back and spent the whole time talking about how liberals and the media lost the war. No one shouted him down.
But he's so polite. I'll bet I'd get shouted down if I tried that.
Quote:
It is sad that on a day honoring graduation from a liberal arts college, the students can only demonstrate that they have learned nothing about intellectual discourse.
He was discoursing. They were engaging in overly enthusiastic dialogue.

Quote:
The response of the super patriots in the audience reminds of the Bush administration's response when Kofni asserted that the U.S. had invaded Iraq without Security Council authorization and should make sure to fulfill its obligations as an occupying force. The got all mad. Right now, the truth itself provokes an angry response.
Perhaps Kofi should place sanctions on the US. He could invoke no-pay zones in the key cafeterias in NYC.

Assuming that it's the truth. I'm going to listen tonight. Before dinner. I'd rather lose my appetite than my lunch.
__________________
If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begun upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of
at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-22-2003, 01:02 AM
The Mad Hatter's Avatar
The Mad Hatter The Mad Hatter is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,978
Default

Just listened to it. It's only 18 minutes and that is with two interruptions. I have sat through much longer and more tedious commencement speeches (when you're in the band, you go to all of 'em).

Anyway, roughly the first third he spent asserting that America's occupation of Iraq is a big mistake for a variety of reasons. He also compared the U.S. to Putin and Sharon in terms of our willingness to use brute force in response to terrorism. He pulled no punches and referred to the U.S. invasion of Iraq as a 'blunder'.

The rest of the speech (~2/3) was a critique of war in general (not specific to Iraq). Much of what he said had merit and I am guessing that he has been influenced by Hoffer. I would say the real story here is that liberal arts graduates had no tolerance for dissent against the war in Iraq. And apparently, no interest in a critique of why war makes us feel good.
__________________
Someone tells us that God loves us as a father loves his children. We are reassured. But then something awful happens. Some qualification is made.... We are reassured again. But then perhaps we ask: what is this assurance of God's (appropriately qualified) love worth, what is this apparent guarantee really a guarantee against? Just what would have to happen not merely (morally and wrongly) to tempt but also (logically and rightly) to entitle us to say "God does not love us" or even "God does not exist"?
-- Antony Flew
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-22-2003, 09:58 AM
George W Bush's Avatar
George W Bush George W Bush is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,100
Default

It's not patriotic to not blindly follow W. That's why the Republicans on this board are such great patriots. Bush is Great!
__________________
Strength and wisdom are not opposing values.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-22-2003, 10:06 AM
Aaron Brachowitz's Avatar
Aaron Brachowitz Aaron Brachowitz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 41.629N, 93.833W
Posts: 9,998
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George W Bush
Bush is Great!
Let's not get carried away. He's no Ronny. Plenty of time yet, though -- about six years to go.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-22-2003, 10:10 AM
Guerilla poster's Avatar
Guerilla poster Guerilla poster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In Griffin's Neighborhood
Posts: 45,915
Default

I think he is a better conservative than Ronny - he just is a much worse presenter.
__________________
"It makes no difference who you vote for — the two parties are really one party representing four percent of the people."

GORE VIDAL (RIP)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.21291 seconds with 7 queries