Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Life Actuarial Jobs
& Annuities,

& Investments
Worldwide

Salary Surveys
Life & Health

Pension
Property & Casualty

DW Simpson & Co.
Actuarial
Recruitment
Worldwide

Casualty Jobs
& Property -- Worldwide
Reinsurance,

Insurance, Bureaus & Consulting


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-05-2003, 12:01 PM
Summer Summer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,174
Default

by the time people get to c4, a lot have stopped writing. My personal opinion (which may be wrong) is that pass rates will be lower for the lower exams, as there are more people who aren't as serious writing the exams. When i made my statement, i should have added that i was only talking about c1.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-05-2003, 02:14 PM
Wigmeister General's Avatar
Wigmeister General Wigmeister General is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beverly Hills off Canon Drive
Favorite beer: Ringnes
Posts: 16,686
Default

Pass rates don't change much. The competition just gets stiffer further down the process.

Before each exam, I used to look at the person to my left, then to my right, and I'd say, "I guess only one of three of us will pass. Who will it be?"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2003, 02:23 PM
beandip beandip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludwig Von Beethoven III
Pass rates don't change much. The competition just gets stiffer further down the process.

Before each exam, I used to look at the person to my left, then to my right, and I'd say, "I guess only one of three of us will pass. Who will it be?"
that's my question, what were the pass rates??
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2003, 02:38 PM
Blue Like Jazz Blue Like Jazz is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 604
Default

About halfway down on this page it give statistics by exam date:

http://www.soa.org/eande/earchive/archivedlist.html
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-19-2003, 05:47 PM
Ralow Ralow is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Show-Me State
Posts: 20
Default

The pass rate was 43% in Spring 2002 and 36% in Fall 2002. It was pretty much at 33% going back except for a ridiculously low 23% in Spring 2000.

Check it out:

http://www.casact.com/admissions/examstatsum.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-21-2003, 08:07 PM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralow
The pass rate was 43% in Spring 2002 and 36% in Fall 2002. It was pretty much at 33% going back except for a ridiculously low 23% in Spring 2000.

Check it out:

http://www.casact.com/admissions/examstatsum.pdf
By the way, I know we're talking about Course 1, but this proves my contention that later exam pass rates can be much higher than 40%. Course 4 in 2002 was 58%.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-23-2003, 11:29 AM
Summer Summer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralow
The pass rate was 43% in Spring 2002 and 36% in Fall 2002. It was pretty much at 33% going back except for a ridiculously low 23% in Spring 2000.

Check it out:

http://www.casact.com/admissions/examstatsum.pdf
By the way, I know we're talking about Course 1, but this proves my contention that later exam pass rates can be much higher than 40%. Course 4 in 2002 was 58%.
wouldn't that make sense, though? You have more "serious" writers. For c1, you will have students who will never make it past c1. The higher up you go, the closer you get to qualifying, the less likely you are to pay money for an exam you don't study very much for.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-23-2003, 10:33 PM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default

Well, I guess it would make sense. But, what is the SOA's official policy on this? Obviously the point we're arguing, about the SOA trying to enforce a certain pass rate on Course 1, cannot extend to all the exams. So, either at some point the SOA just doesn't care (that much) about the pass rate, or they fail to enforce it all that strictly.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-23-2003, 11:39 PM
beandip beandip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 58
Default Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Well, I guess it would make sense. But, what is the SOA's official policy on this? Obviously the point we're arguing, about the SOA trying to enforce a certain pass rate on Course 1, cannot extend to all the exams. So, either at some point the SOA just doesn't care (that much) about the pass rate, or they fail to enforce it all that strictly.
This thread was posted pertaining to pass mark for the May 2003 course 1
examination. NOT historical trends of the SOA's elusive pass mark. I was just looking for some simple feedback, not extensive research which delves into moral and philosophical issues of the SOA. Your comment, has spawned a new motto for myself.

"just take the test and answer the stupid questions"

thankyou.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-23-2003, 11:56 PM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by beandip
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Well, I guess it would make sense. But, what is the SOA's official policy on this? Obviously the point we're arguing, about the SOA trying to enforce a certain pass rate on Course 1, cannot extend to all the exams. So, either at some point the SOA just doesn't care (that much) about the pass rate, or they fail to enforce it all that strictly.
This thread was posted pertaining to pass mark for the May 2003 course 1
examination. NOT historical trends of the SOA's elusive pass mark. I was just looking for some simple feedback, not extensive research which delves into moral and philosophical issues of the SOA. Your comment, has spawned a new motto for myself.

"just take the test and answer the stupid questions"

thankyou.
Whoa...sorry.

I was just going where the thread went. When someone said that the SOA intends to enforce that at least 30% and no more than 40% pass, then I felt the need to challenge that, or clarify that we're only talking about Course 1. Because it's certainly not true at some point beyond Course 1.

Having said that, though, the pass mark will not be higher than 25, even if this is an easy test. I feel confident about that.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.42767 seconds with 7 queries