Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs

Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-24-2003, 12:07 AM
beandip beandip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 58
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Quote:
Originally Posted by beandip
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Well, I guess it would make sense. But, what is the SOA's official policy on this? Obviously the point we're arguing, about the SOA trying to enforce a certain pass rate on Course 1, cannot extend to all the exams. So, either at some point the SOA just doesn't care (that much) about the pass rate, or they fail to enforce it all that strictly.
This thread was posted pertaining to pass mark for the May 2003 course 1
examination. NOT historical trends of the SOA's elusive pass mark. I was just looking for some simple feedback, not extensive research which delves into moral and philosophical issues of the SOA. Your comment, has spawned a new motto for myself.

"just take the test and answer the stupid questions"

thankyou.
Whoa...sorry.

I was just going where the thread went. When someone said that the SOA intends to enforce that at least 30% and no more than 40% pass, then I felt the need to challenge that, or clarify that we're only talking about Course 1. Because it's certainly not true at some point beyond Course 1.

Having said that, though, the pass mark will not be higher than 25, even if this is an easy test. I feel confident about that.
you took all the fun outta my comment??
you were suppose to rebuttle (spelling) ??
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-24-2003, 12:09 AM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by beandip
you took all the fun outta my comment??
you were suppose to rebuttle (spelling) ??
Okay, then. You're an idiot.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-24-2003, 12:22 AM
john john is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: private
Posts: 280
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Having said that, though, the pass mark will not be higher than 25, even if this is an easy test. I feel confident about that.
What makes you think that? Everyone I talked to thinks the test was easy. If the pass mark is that low, that means the passing score is high. I hope it is not so.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-24-2003, 12:25 AM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlau
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
Having said that, though, the pass mark will not be higher than 25, even if this is an easy test. I feel confident about that.
What makes you think that? Everyone I talked to thinks the test was easy. If the pass mark is that low, that means the passing score is high. I hope it is not so.
?

I said pass mark=25, as in 25/40 questions. As for pass rate, I have no idea.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-24-2003, 04:12 AM
hugolizard hugolizard is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29
Default

Take a look at the nov 2001 exam, wasn't that easy? And the passing score was only 24/40. Now just because some of your friends think the may 2003 exam was easy doesn't mean the majority of the candidates think it was easy. The guy that sat right beside me during the exam simply slept for the 4 hours. And I'm sure there were a lot of people who wrote the exam without having done much preparation. It's the same every year. And I'm confident that the passing score this time around is going to be around 23-24, and yet the passing rate is going to be less than 40%.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-24-2003, 05:01 AM
hugolizard hugolizard is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29
Default

Actually I might be wrong on the nov 2001 passing score. It might be 22/40 instead. Not completely sure but I think it was definately 24 or less.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-24-2003, 09:41 AM
Adamixoye Adamixoye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 1,003
Default

My point in saying 25 is that it won't be any higher. I don't think that's ever been the case. A lot of people think, compared to practice tests or compared to times they previously wrote, that this test was one of the easiest in a while. I realize there is some observational bias there, but I think there's still some truth to it. This was my first time writing, so I probably don't have the most objective viewpoint, but I thought it was as easy or easier than all the available tests from previous years.

Bottom line...the pass mark is always from 20 to 25, usually 22-24. So if you got 25 and above, feel safe. If you got less than 25, there may be some hope, but it's much more dicey.
__________________
I don't know about you, but at the moment, I am made of incandescent fury.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-24-2003, 02:11 PM
john john is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: private
Posts: 280
Default Re: Perhaps some sort of regression formula is needed ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamixoye
I said pass mark=25, as in 25/40 questions. As for pass rate, I have no idea.
Sorry, I misread your post.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.19484 seconds with 7 queries