Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet KC Cho, DW Simpson Partner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:19 PM
coldplay coldplay is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 25
Default What is Darth Vader Rule in ASM?

I did google and wiki. they give me bunch of star wars stuff and rule of two. unfortunately, still dont understand it. Could anybody please explain it in Math. Thx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:30 PM
Gandalf's Avatar
Gandalf Gandalf is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
SOA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 26,455
Default

Why search there? If you do an AO search for "darth", you'll find some explanations of the rule.

Here is one thread about it; there are others.

Basically, if you have a survival function for a non-negative random variable, its expected value is equal to the integral from 0 to infinity of s(x) dx [or, equivalently, of [1-F(x)] dx.

If there is a maximum value of the random variable, you can use that as the upper limit of the integral, since s(x) = 0 above that. 0 is always the lower limit. (There are variations that don't use 0 as the lower limit, but they get the same result as using 0 as the lower limit.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:42 PM
coldplay coldplay is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 25
Default

Thank you, Gandalf. But why Darth Vader? why not Frodo Baggins Rule ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:45 PM
Tight Tin Foil Hat's Avatar
Tight Tin Foil Hat Tight Tin Foil Hat is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheecagoland
Studying for 4/C
Favorite beer: Jooky
Posts: 733
Default

Here's my contribution. All those math-inclined members of AO feel free to poke holes in my explanation.

For any fully continuous random variable X where all possible values of X are >= 0

For any discrete random variable X where all possible values of X are >= 0 AND integers


If you have a mixture you mix accordingly.

What does this have to do with Darth Vader? I guess it's some esoteric actuarial humor...
__________________
1 2 3F 3L 4 5 6 7 8 9
George Reisman's Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2008, 11:19 PM
carrytheCrøss carrytheCrøss is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tight Tin Foil Hat View Post
What does this have to do with Darth Vader? I guess it's some esoteric actuarial humor...
Correct.
__________________
a wonderful post
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2008, 11:21 PM
Gandalf's Avatar
Gandalf Gandalf is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
SOA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 26,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coldplay View Post
Thank you, Gandalf. But why Darth Vader? why not Frodo Baggins Rule ?
See this thread for more about the rule, and in particular post 6. Krzysio gave it the name (I think), so I guess he's the ultimate authority on the reason.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2008, 03:13 AM
booyaolian booyaolian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 125
Default

Whether a R.V. is continuous or discrete, and it's ">=0," its expected value is the integral from 0 to infinity of Sx(X), which is the survival function.

For a discrete R.V. and it is ">=1," its expected value is the summation, from n=1 to n=infinity, of Sx(X).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2008, 09:53 AM
cj101 cj101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Can someone give an example in which you would use the Darth Vader Rule and also give the calculation for solving such a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2008, 10:04 AM
daaaave daaaave is offline
David Revelle
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cj101 View Post
Can someone give an example in which you would use the Darth Vader Rule and also give the calculation for solving such a problem.
Suppose losses have an exponential distribution with mean 3, and there is a benefit limit of 10. Then the expected payment can either be calculated as:

which I don't feel like computing, or you could use the survival function and get

(note that the second integral only goes to 10 because the probability of a payment being greater than 10 is 0).

The point is that using the survival function is often quicker when dealing with mixed distributions, which includes problems with continuous loss amounts and either a deductible or a benefit limit. It also saves you a step of calculus when dealing with exponential distributions and Pareto distributions.
__________________

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2008, 10:31 AM
cj101 cj101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Wow that looks extremely handy. And all along I was wasting my time with the integration formula for an exponential times x. That will be nice for the exam because I won't have to calculate xe^ax/a^2-e^ax/a. Thanks a bunch daaave
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.18215 seconds with 7 queries