Thread where you list awesome things about yourself

[The Smokin' Cracktuary]

Originally Posted by Simply Brilliant

Read into my post more, you are missing what I was talking about.

I think it is you who needs to read into what your friends are telling you more. It almost seems like you are taking their words are compliments. Yet they are clearly concerned about your unhealthy lifestyle.

Originally Posted by The Smokin' Cracktuary

I think it is you who needs to read into what your friends are telling you more. It almost seems like you are taking their words are compliments. Yet they are clearly concerned about your unhealthy lifestyle.

Oh so they weren't saying he had a big tool.

[The Smokin' Cracktuary]

Originally Posted by Darth Cheney

Oh so they weren't saying he had a big tool.

Even if they were, the comment has no perspective. A girl saying he has a big tool means very little without a little more information.

For example, if the girl has only ever seen/touched a couple tools, she isn't really qualified to comment. Similarly, when his GF says his tool is too big to handle, that means little without knowing her body size and type. Therefore, the only way him saying that would be telling would be to say,

"My ex GF told me I have a big tool, ....and she is a huge slut."

and/or

"My GF tells me I am almost too much to handle, .....and she is not a midget."

Then he is a little closer to making some point. His comments alone were not enough to suggest anything about his tool size. He would have needed the above qualifiers (or something effectively similar) to get any real telling information across.


However, that still is not necessarily anything to brag about. Pure tool size means very little without perspective on his body type. For instance and 8 inch tool is good for a guy who is 5'8". An 8 in. tool is ridiculous for a guy who is 4'10". But an 8 in. tool is pitiful for a guy who is 7'0".

You have to factor in the person's body type for anything meaningful to be said. A smaller person with a big tool is much more mobile and can perform an wider variety of tasks with his tool. A large person with the same tool size is immobile, clumsy, and limited in what he can do with it. Therefore, the smaller guy has a much bigger "effective" tool size.

That is on top of the proportionality of it. A big guy may have a big tool in absolute terms, but it is proportionally pathetic.

This is a similar relationship between height and weight. It means nothing to say how much someone weighs without also giving their height. In the same way, it means nothing for a man to say how big his junk is without giving his other dimensions.

For hieght and weight, we attempted to solve this problem with the "Body Mass Index" (BMI). Similarly, I suggest we develope a "PSI" for refering qualifying tool size. This would take into account body type when quoting junk size.



After all of this is considered, Simply Brilliant's post conveyed very little information about his actual tool size. It was effectively a failed attempt at bragging.

A complete attempt would have gone something like this,

"Simply Brilliant's GF complains that I am too big, and she is a normal sized non-midget girl. His ex-GF tells me I am much bigger than he is, and she is a huge slut who has handled a great many tools in her day.

Additionally, I have a PSI of 48."

That conveys the correct information for people to make an accurate assessment.

Originally Posted by Listeria

Anitha is awesome because she is from India + those other things. That's what makes it special.

dirty thoughts

[Chief Petosky]

Originally Posted by Anitha Desai

Ditto! I can also move just my right eyebrow up on my forehead, while my left eyebrow stays in place. I can fold my tongue on itself. I can make "farty" noises with my palms pressed against eachother. I can move my neck so that it appears as if my head is moving horizontally while my torso is still. You know, like the dancing dolls....
Wow! I am teh awesome!

You most certainly are. I think I can do the eyebrow thing with my right brow. I'll have to look in the mirror, though, to confirm ... yes, pretty successful! We're like that yinyang symbol!

[Simply Brilliant]

Originally Posted by The Smokin' Cracktuary

Even if they were, the comment has no perspective. A girl saying he has a big tool means very little without a little more information.

For example, if the girl has only ever seen/touched a couple tools, she isn't really qualified to comment. Similarly, when his GF says his tool is too big to handle, that means little without knowing her body size and type. Therefore, the only way him saying that would be telling would be to say,

"My ex GF told me I have a big tool, ....and she is a huge slut."

and/or

"My GF tells me I am almost too much to handle, .....and she is not a midget."

Then he is a little closer to making some point. His comments alone were not enough to suggest anything about his tool size. He would have needed the above qualifiers (or something effectively similar) to get any real telling information across.


However, that still is not necessarily anything to brag about. Pure tool size means very little without perspective on his body type. For instance and 8 inch tool is good for a guy who is 5'8". An 8 in. tool is ridiculous for a guy who is 4'10". But an 8 in. tool is pitiful for a guy who is 7'0".

You have to factor in the person's body type for anything meaningful to be said. A smaller person with a big tool is much more mobile and can perform an wider variety of tasks with his tool. A large person with the same tool size is immobile, clumsy, and limited in what he can do with it. Therefore, the smaller guy has a much bigger "effective" tool size.

That is on top of the proportionality of it. A big guy may have a big tool in absolute terms, but it is proportionally pathetic.

This is a similar relationship between height and weight. It means nothing to say how much someone weighs without also giving their height. In the same way, it means nothing for a man to say how big his junk is without giving his other dimensions.

For hieght and weight, we attempted to solve this problem with the "Body Mass Index" (BMI). Similarly, I suggest we develope a "PSI" for refering qualifying tool size. This would take into account body type when quoting junk size.



After all of this is considered, Simply Brilliant's post conveyed very little information about his actual tool size. It was effectively a failed attempt at bragging.

A complete attempt would have gone something like this,

"Simply Brilliant's GF complains that I am too big, and she is a normal sized non-midget girl. His ex-GF tells me I am much bigger than he is, and she is a huge slut who has handled a great many tools in her day.

Additionally, I have a PSI of 48."

That conveys the correct information for people to make an accurate assessment.

All I have to say was to this post and . If you really want me to clarify I can, you are missing the super star as in SHAQ who is 7'1, much have an infant's arm as a tool, and is generally more althetic and lighter on his feet than the average 5'11 person, and can support his weight as he must when being on top.

The stories that I hear about women comparing, never mention "effective" tool but rather length and girth, as I am not an expert on this, maybe a female can comment.

Originally Posted by Simply Brilliant

much have an infant's arm as a tool

RN......Earthquake made that joke.

[Actuarial Groupie]

Originally Posted by The Smokin' Cracktuary

Additionally, I have a PSI of 48."

That conveys the correct information for people to make an accurate assessment.

Wouldn't we need some kind of chart to gage the "48" as being good or bad?

[Sweet Lou]

Originally Posted by The Smokin' Cracktuary

Even if they were, the comment has no perspective. A girl saying he has a big tool means very little without a little more information.

For example, if the girl has only ever seen/touched a couple tools, she isn't really qualified to comment. Similarly, when his GF says his tool is too big to handle, that means little without knowing her body size and type. Therefore, the only way him saying that would be telling would be to say,

"My ex GF told me I have a big tool, ....and she is a huge slut."

and/or

"My GF tells me I am almost too much to handle, .....and she is not a midget."

Then he is a little closer to making some point. His comments alone were not enough to suggest anything about his tool size. He would have needed the above qualifiers (or something effectively similar) to get any real telling information across.


However, that still is not necessarily anything to brag about. Pure tool size means very little without perspective on his body type. For instance and 8 inch tool is good for a guy who is 5'8". An 8 in. tool is ridiculous for a guy who is 4'10". But an 8 in. tool is pitiful for a guy who is 7'0".

You have to factor in the person's body type for anything meaningful to be said. A smaller person with a big tool is much more mobile and can perform an wider variety of tasks with his tool. A large person with the same tool size is immobile, clumsy, and limited in what he can do with it. Therefore, the smaller guy has a much bigger "effective" tool size.

That is on top of the proportionality of it. A big guy may have a big tool in absolute terms, but it is proportionally pathetic.

This is a similar relationship between height and weight. It means nothing to say how much someone weighs without also giving their height. In the same way, it means nothing for a man to say how big his junk is without giving his other dimensions.

For hieght and weight, we attempted to solve this problem with the "Body Mass Index" (BMI). Similarly, I suggest we develope a "PSI" for refering qualifying tool size. This would take into account body type when quoting junk size.



After all of this is considered, Simply Brilliant's post conveyed very little information about his actual tool size. It was effectively a failed attempt at bragging.

A complete attempt would have gone something like this,

"Simply Brilliant's GF complains that I am too big, and she is a normal sized non-midget girl. His ex-GF tells me I am much bigger than he is, and she is a huge slut who has handled a great many tools in her day.

Additionally, I have a PSI of 48."

That conveys the correct information for people to make an accurate assessment.

That was one of the few times I really laughed to myself.

[The Smokin' Cracktuary]

Originally Posted by Actuarial Groupie

Wouldn't we need some kind of chart to gage the "48" as being good or bad?

Yes. I am working on it.