Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Modules 1-5
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson & Company International Actuary Jobs
  Canada  Asia  Australia  Life  Pension  Casualty
Bermuda, United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, Worldwide


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2008, 11:38 PM
MathinTucson's Avatar
MathinTucson MathinTucson is online now
Member
AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Curitiba
Posts: 2,952
Default EOM 3 Task 1 Wage inflation

In order to calculate the CPP covered earnings and maximum pension earnings over time, you need to make an assumption about the growth in average Cascadia wages over time. We aren't given this figure, but the input in the spreadsheet seems to assume 4.0% (lower than the Chocolate factory). Since we were asked to check the calculations and not the inputs, I'm going to leave it as is. Anyone disagree?

Also, the CPP covered earnings and max pension earnings grow at different rates in the spreadsheet. I didn't see anything in the assignment description that would indicate that this is correct. Did I miss something?
__________________
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design." – Hayek
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2008, 11:36 PM
jraven's Avatar
jraven jraven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Studying for nothing!
College: Penn State
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathinTucson View Post
Also, the CPP covered earnings and max pension earnings grow at different rates in the spreadsheet. I didn't see anything in the assignment description that would indicate that this is correct. Did I miss something?
I agree -- since the rates in the spreadsheet are currently such that the max pensionable earnings end up growing at a slower rate than the CPP covered earnings it isn't technically a problem [the assignment only states that the private plan's max pensionable earnings must be at most 4 times the average Cascadian income (hence twice the CPP limit), but seems to leave open the option that it could be less]. But it seems strange to me, especially since the assignment makes no mention of it.

Just one more thing to tweak on the spreadsheet.
__________________
The Poisson distribution wasn't named after a fish -- it was named after a man ... who was named after a fish.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2008, 06:27 PM
jraven's Avatar
jraven jraven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Studying for nothing!
College: Penn State
Posts: 1,264
Default

Oh, and another thing wonky with the spreadsheet -- the assignment states "An individual's covered earnings under the CPP many not increase by more than inflation during the final ten years of employment." This makes sense, since otherwise employer's could game the system by handing out massive raises to their lower paid employee's just before retirement, thereby boosting their CPP pension benefit for little cost to the employer.

But that's not what the spreadsheet does. The spreadsheet limits the CPP maximum covered earnings to grow at the rate of inflation in the final ten years (age 55+) -- but as long as the individual's covered earnings stay below that cap it grows the individual's covered earnings at the pensionable earnings rate, which exceeds inflation for ages 55-59. [Specifically, at inflation + 0.5% for ages 55-59.]

There are so many things screwed up with that worksheet.
__________________
The Poisson distribution wasn't named after a fish -- it was named after a man ... who was named after a fish.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
eom3, task1

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.21136 seconds with 7 queries