Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Careers - Employment
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Download the Q1 DW Simpson Newsletter - Bermuda Actuarial Jobs Issue

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2008, 10:13 PM
covariance128 covariance128 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 65
Default difference between consultant in retirement and administration in retirement

I am wondering what are the major differences between consultation in retirement vs administration. What are the major tasks involved and what are the qualities required for each of these departments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2008, 11:30 PM
deathfrombelow deathfrombelow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,622
Default

It depends on what you mean by consulting in administration. Most of the larger "actuarial" consulting firms have administration consulting practices and more general "retirement" consulting practices. Often, admin is a subgroup of the larger retirement/pension/HR consulting group. If you're at one of these firms, there may be some degree of overlap between the work.

There are also standalone administration consulting firms and also firms that administer plans who also provide administrative consulting. To make it even more complicated, the big actuarial consulting firms also have administration groups that actually administer the plans, though this is usually called working "in administration" as opposed to "administrative consulting". I'm going to speak specifically to the case of the difference between "administrative consulting" and "retirement consulting" in one of the big firms like Mercer, Hewitt, Wyatt, Towers, etc.

Assuming you're interested in being an actuary, you could work in either, but you'll find a higher concentration of actuaries outside of administration than inside it, as most administration tasks aren't specifically "actuarial" in nature.

Administration tasks include helping clients ensure that plans are being administered in compliance with regulations, helping verify that changes to client plans are being implemented and administered properly, providing support for unusual or complicated benefit calculations, and so forth. The work tends to require great depth in understanding the specifics of both the law and the client's plans and administrative practice. There is less of the stuff you see on actuarial exams involved in these positions, but there is definitely a good deal of FM stuff involved and also exam M stuff at times.

More actuarially-oriented "retirement consulting" jobs might include tasks such as performing valuations, performing asset liability studies, performing experience studies, consulting on legislative changes, and helping clients with plan design. Often, these tasks require the application of more general skills, though they definitely require a great deal of client and regulatory knowledge at times. If you're in retirement consulting, you're probably more of a generalist than the people who are more specifically in administration within a given firm.

Not to be mean, but just to help you out if you're not a native English speaker, we usually call it "consulting in X field" instead of "consultation in X field". My apologies if you're a native speaker and just don't proofread online stuff. I'm with you if that's the case.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.14160 seconds with 7 queries