![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't get it. It's Bush's plan. It's for the rich. No, it's for the staggeringly rich. These two things alone should make it DOA with Democrats. Add in the fact that their base hates it (okay, everyone hates it). But Franks, Reid, Dodd, and Pelosi are all on board. Not one prominent Dem has spoken against it. The only thing a Democrat could like about this plan is that it's a vast expansion of government's role in the economy. But that's a very soft, long-term benefit compared to a pretty harsh short-term negative.
Now the House Republicans have taken up the charge against their own president's plan. Are the rank-and-file Democrats in Congress just total sheep? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree. I don't get it either.
I'm sure it's all politically motivated, somehow. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is not supported by statute or common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back. - Life-Line, Robert A. Heinlein, 1939 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
So you'll be voting for him then?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sure, they tinkered around the edges a little to pick up a few crumbs for the folks. But they're ready to pass something today if they can get enough Republicans to go along. Passing something today means passing the Bush plan in basically its current form.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|