Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Exam DP - Design and Pricing > Individual Life & Annuities Design and Pricing
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Entry Level
Actuarial Jobs

Casualty, Health

Pensions
Life, Investments

DW Simpson & Co.
Actuarial
Recruitment
Worldwide

Casualty Jobs
& Property -- Worldwide
Reinsurance,

Insurance, Bureaus & Consulting

Salary Surveys
Life & Health

Pension
Property & Casualty


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2008, 01:46 PM
Ham Ham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Default Fall 2004 - 8I - Q9 (b)

Can anyone explain this solution to me? I seem to be confused by the notation and just can't really figure out what exactly is happening.

If the person is age 55.5 and waits 6 months for the waiver to start, this take his age to 56. So we need premiums (waived) for age 56, 57, 58, 59.... hence it only uses four values from the chart for the D[x+k+1/2]+s+1/2. But then the solution adds a 0.5 to the end and then multiplies everything by the $100 premium. What is the 0.5 all about?

You can probably tell from this explanation that I don't really understand this concept so any help will be good. I am glad this part was only worth one point!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2008, 01:51 PM
rekrap's Avatar
rekrap rekrap is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 21,816
Default

I believe the .5 at the end is related to the fact that the benefit is retroactive to the date of disability, so that even though there is a 6-month waiting period, half the age 55 premium is included (since paid continuously throughout the year).

The fact that it's all multiplied by 100 is because that's the premium and you are calculating the benefit which waives all those premiums.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:01 PM
LifeAct LifeAct is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,226
Default

If the benefit goes until age 60, why don't we waive the age 60 premium?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:15 PM
rekrap's Avatar
rekrap rekrap is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 21,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeAct View Post
If the benefit goes until age 60, why don't we waive the age 60 premium?
Until, but not including? State your assumption and move on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:24 PM
LifeAct LifeAct is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekrap View Post
Until, but not including? State your assumption and move on.
good idea.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.17163 seconds with 7 queries