Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > MFE
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Entry Level
Actuarial Jobs

Casualty, Health

Pensions
Life, Investments

DW Simpson & Co.
Actuarial
Recruitment
Worldwide

Casualty Jobs
& Property -- Worldwide
Reinsurance,

Insurance, Bureaus & Consulting

Salary Surveys
Life & Health

Pension
Property & Casualty


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:07 AM
Nonpareil's Avatar
Nonpareil Nonpareil is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rocket City
Studying for Exam C
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfkwan View Post
So is #7 the only one that we're all pretty much agreeing the PAK has wrong?
I think so.
__________________
"One must do no violence to nature, nor model it in conformity to any blindly formed chimera." Janos Bolyai

"Theoria cum praxis." Gottfried von Leibniz
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:27 AM
td25er's Avatar
td25er td25er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silva086 View Post
Yup, got this as well. 300 from the first part (puts?), 0 from the barrier, 60 from the Asian call
I thought only the Puts ended up paying off?
__________________
"Okay, settle down, prostitutes."
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:37 AM
Nonpareil's Avatar
Nonpareil Nonpareil is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rocket City
Studying for Exam C
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by td25er View Post
I thought only the Puts ended up paying off?
No the Asian call paid off as well. The average was 42 and the strike was 40, so you got 2 per Asian call, and you had 30 of those, for $60, plus the $300 on the puts, for a total of $360.
__________________
"One must do no violence to nature, nor model it in conformity to any blindly formed chimera." Janos Bolyai

"Theoria cum praxis." Gottfried von Leibniz
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:44 AM
coolhand's Avatar
coolhand coolhand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by christian View Post
No the Asian call paid off as well. The average was 42 and the strike was 40, so you got 2 per Asian call, and you had 30 of those, for $60, plus the $300 on the puts, for a total of $360.
Agree.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:46 AM
Heathen Heathen is offline
Officially Funny
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: At the bar
Studying for BAC
College: Landover Baptist University
Favorite beer: Dry Gin
Posts: 10,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newl07 View Post
There was one on barrier options, the total payoff was 360 E. Barrier wasn't hit making payoff of that portion zero.
yep, got 360
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:47 AM
td25er's Avatar
td25er td25er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by christian View Post
No the Asian call paid off as well. The average was 42 and the strike was 40, so you got 2 per Asian call, and you had 30 of those, for $60, plus the $300 on the puts, for a total of $360.
Dear Lord, I did the Asian options as puts. Easiest question on the exam and I missed it b/c I can't read! Oh well. Sitting at 14/19....13/19 if 7 is wrong.
__________________
"Okay, settle down, prostitutes."
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:48 AM
coolhand's Avatar
coolhand coolhand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by td25er View Post
Dear Lord, I did the Asian options as puts. Easiest question on the exam and I missed it b/c I can't read! Oh well. Sitting at 14/19....13/19 if 7 is wrong.
Either way you are probably fine! Good job!
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:53 AM
Heathen Heathen is offline
Officially Funny
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: At the bar
Studying for BAC
College: Landover Baptist University
Favorite beer: Dry Gin
Posts: 10,151
Default

angst.... 2k raise... angst...
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:12 AM
Eagle.K.Y Eagle.K.Y is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newl07 View Post
pi/alpha problem. My answer was 0.119.
I believe, after B.S formula, you will have Pi/Alpha = 2 * N(0.15) - 1 = 0.119
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:18 AM
Eagle.K.Y Eagle.K.Y is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PSUHockey1 View Post
That was for #15 I believe. I also came up with an exp(rt) of 1.09xxxxx, but it led me to 1097 C rather than 771 A as Eagle posted.
I don't remember C and P exactly at time 0, but I believe the difference was 6.8.


Originally Posted by Eagle.K.Y View Post
I spent heck time on that one too.

at the 0, C - P = 40 - K exp{-rT}
at the t, 14.4 - 0.30 = 50 - K exp(-r(T-t)}

find the ratio of 1 and 2, you will have exp{rt}, then to find initial investment interest during the t. (I guess mine was 1.09xxxxx)

I chose A, 771.
Maybe I was wrong about this one, but the exp{rt} should be correct. What I did is the profit includes 2 parts

1. price change of stock and opt

2. interest lost by initial investment

for 1, 100 * 10 (stock) + 200 * (C(t) - C(0)) + 300 * (P(t) - P(0))

for 2, the initial investment is [C(0) * 200 + 300 * P(0)]*exp{rt}

1 - 2 = the profit = 771
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.23454 seconds with 7 queries