Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > MFE
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

US PROPERTY AND CASUALTY JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:04 AM
rfkwan rfkwan is offline
Member
SOA CCA AAA
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Studying for C
College: UCSB Alumnus
Posts: 62
Default

My mistake. The sum was 504.
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:08 AM
jvaldez84 jvaldez84 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Studying for C
College: Texas A&M Alumni
Posts: 1,053
Default

Are we saying the answer is not 360?
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:09 AM
stephm115 stephm115 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yanksrule08 View Post
How confident are you that you weren't supposed to use the first month's stock price? Did you read that the calls were bought on the same day of the first listed stock price?

The reason I ask is because I didn't pay attention to this, so if you double-checked that the first listed price was the price on the day the calls were bought, I'll have to take your word for it and assume I got this wrong.


Edit: if the Asian calls were 1-year calls, it doesn't make sense to use the average of 11 months of prices, does it?
At this point, I'm not confident about specifics of this problem. I am confident that if you purchased the stock on Jan. 1 2008, you would NOT use the stock price on Jan 1. 2008 to calculate the average. You would start with the stock price on Feb. 1 (or Jan. 31). I can't remember what was given. All I know is I added up what I thought was 12 of 13 stock prices and divided by 12. I did it twice and both times got 38.66 (or something like that). It just bums me out that I might have made the same mistake twice when I thought I had double-checked my answer.

I thought the answer was 300 because I didn't think the Asian option produced a payoff because my average price of 38 was lower than the strike of 40.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:13 AM
The Spocker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yanksrule08 View Post
She borrowed $600 at T=0 to pay for her investments.

At the time she settled all her positions, she needed to re-pay the lender 600*e^rt, so her profit for this part of the problem was
-600(e^rt - 1)
ahh, that's the part i missed. I forgot she borrowed the money.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:17 AM
The Spocker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yanksrule08 View Post
She borrowed $600 at T=0 to pay for her investments.

At the time she settled all her positions, she needed to re-pay the lender 600*e^rt, so her profit for this part of the problem was
-600(e^rt - 1)
wait, so let me get this straight.

the profit total was 1721 (ish)

she borrowed 600. interest was around $54. so the answer was like 1067?
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:29 AM
Nonpareil's Avatar
Nonpareil Nonpareil is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rocket City
Studying for Exam C
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Spocker View Post
how did you apply the interest once you got the 1.09?

Well you had to borrow something like 6,000 to pay for the stocks, the puts, and the calls you purchased. So you mutiply .09XX*6,xxx to get the interest on the loan.
__________________
"One must do no violence to nature, nor model it in conformity to any blindly formed chimera." Janos Bolyai

"Theoria cum praxis." Gottfried von Leibniz
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:31 AM
Nonpareil's Avatar
Nonpareil Nonpareil is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rocket City
Studying for Exam C
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephm115 View Post
At this point, I'm not confident about specifics of this problem. I am confident that if you purchased the stock on Jan. 1 2008, you would NOT use the stock price on Jan 1. 2008 to calculate the average. You would start with the stock price on Feb. 1 (or Jan. 31). I can't remember what was given. All I know is I added up what I thought was 12 of 13 stock prices and divided by 12. I did it twice and both times got 38.66 (or something like that). It just bums me out that I might have made the same mistake twice when I thought I had double-checked my answer.

I thought the answer was 300 because I didn't think the Asian option produced a payoff because my average price of 38 was lower than the strike of 40.

I thought we were given the closing prices for 12 months at the end of each month, so I used the data for all 12 months in the table.
__________________
"One must do no violence to nature, nor model it in conformity to any blindly formed chimera." Janos Bolyai

"Theoria cum praxis." Gottfried von Leibniz
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:37 AM
Need Vacation's Avatar
Need Vacation Need Vacation is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by christian View Post
I thought we were given the closing prices for 12 months at the end of each month, so I used the data for all 12 months in the table.
There was an up-and-in put option with 55 as a barier in the portfolio. I had a payoff 0 for that one because the stock price never reached 55. Any one with me on that one?
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:39 AM
yanksrule08 yanksrule08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Spocker View Post
wait, so let me get this straight.

the profit total was 1721 (ish)

she borrowed 600. interest was around $54. so the answer was like 1067?
no, you don't subtract $654, you only subtract the interest that the 600 earned (54).

Cash flow at time 0: +$600
Cash flow at time t: -$600e^rt

Profit: (600-600e^rt) = 600(1 - e^rt) = -600(e^rt - 1)
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 11-05-2008, 10:43 AM
The Spocker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yanksrule08 View Post
no, you don't subtract $654, you only subtract the interest that the 600 earned (54).

Cash flow at time 0: +$600
Cash flow at time t: -$600e^rt

Profit: (600-600e^rt) = 600(1 - e^rt) = -600(e^rt - 1)
ahh, if your $600 that is throwing me off. I think christian is right, around 6000 was borrowed (the stock was 40 and I remember 100 shares being purchased, that's 4000 there alone).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.30542 seconds with 7 queries