Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 4/C - Construction and Evaluation of Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Salary Surveys
Pension
Property & Casualty
Life & Health

Health
Actuary Jobs

Insurance &
Consulting --
Students,
Associates &

Fellows

D.W. Simpson
& Company

International
Actuarial
Recruiters

www.dwsimpson.com

Casualty Jobs
& Property --
Students
Associates &

Fellows


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:51 PM
The Half The Half is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
College: Arizona State University
Posts: 90
Default ASM Section 15

In section 15 of ASM, Weishaus describes 3 ways to handle aggregate deductibles. The first of which is identical to the way deductibles are treated earlier on in the manual.

Namely, if you want to find expected losses in excess of the deductible, you can use the formula E[X] - E[X^d]. So for aggregate losses you just substitute S for X and get E[S] - E[S^d]. Then he explains 3 ways to calculate E[S^d].

The first of which I understand completely, you sum the value of S times the probabbilty of loss S all the way up to the deductible and then you add the deductible times the probability of the loss being greater than or equal to the deductible.

The second two methods I have no clue, and have read the examples and his expanation numerous times. Can anyone shed any light on these other two methods.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2009, 01:42 PM
Abraham Weishaus Abraham Weishaus is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,218
Default

Personally I prefer the first method as well. You're not going to get too many questions on this topic anyway (maybe one), so just know one method well.

This is not meant to stop other students from posting a better explanation of the other methods, or from providing advice on how I could improve the exposition of the other two methods.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2009, 06:36 PM
Ballin Ballin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Default

I agree that the first one is easier to understand so I am going to disregard the other two....

Sorry, I am not any help; but if I were you, I would focus on the first one (especially since it is intuitive and memorization is not needed).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.11702 seconds with 7 queries