Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > MFE
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

IMMEDIATE NEED - Multiple Retained Actuarial Jobs
Apply now at www.DWSimpson.com/jobs/retained

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2009, 09:32 AM
Samad3 Samad3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 53
Default SOA sample question 48

ds1/s1 = .06dt + .02dZ
ds2/s2 = .03dt + k * dZ

s1(0) = 100
s2(0) = 50

Stocks are non-dividend and r=.04.

Want to contruct zero-investment, risk-free portfolio with stocks and risk-free bonds. Have 1 share of Stock 1 in portfolio, how many shares of Stock 2 do we need to buy?



My approach was to solve this by using the abitrage strategy for sharpe ratios. (If share ratio 1>sharpe ratio 2, buy 1/S(1)*sigma1, sell 1/S(2)sigma2 and lend ...) I got the question wrong because I missed that selling -4 shares of stock 2 equals buying 4 shares.

The part I don't understand is I thought two perfectly correlated assets had the same sharpe ratio. (both have dZ so that means they are perfectly correlated?). It seems contradictory to solve this problem as an Arbitrage problem after we have already set the sharpe ratios equal to eachother to solve for k. How do we decide Stock 1 has the higher sharpe ratio, I thought they were equal?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2009, 11:01 AM
Abraham Weishaus Abraham Weishaus is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,195
Default

I'm not sure what your problem is. The Sharpe ratios ARE equal, arbitrage is impossible, and therefore you immediately know that the risk-free portfolio you construct must earn 4%, which gives you the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2009, 02:40 PM
Samad3 Samad3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 53
Default

I thought I was solving it correctly by doing the following:

Buy 1/(100*02) Shares of S1
=.5
But told we have 1 share of Stock 1 so scale this up
=.5 x (2) = 1

Need to sell 1/(50*-.01) Shares of S2
=-2
Scale up by same factor
=-2*2 = -4.

Sell -4 should mean buy 4 shares of S2. (There would also be an amount to lend)

I think this is the correct answer but I think my reasoning in using this approach is off. Doesn't SRatio #1 > SRatio #2 need to be valid to use this approach?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2009, 07:49 PM
Abraham Weishaus Abraham Weishaus is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,195
Default

No, you're just saying the same thing. You've constructed a risk-free portfolio, and since the Sharpe ratios are equal, it will only earn the risk-free rate. The proof that the Sharpe ratios are equal is if they weren't, the portfolio you constructed would earn less than the risk-free rate, so you could sell it, invest the money risk-free, and have a guaranteed profit at no cost.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.15867 seconds with 7 queries