![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the life of me I can never understand this problem. In ASM there are many problems about discrete dividends, where you can solve it by using S'=S-PV(divs) and using the forward volatility in d1.
In this problem they just give volatility with no mention of it being a forward volatility, but using it as-is yields the correct answer. What am I not understanding? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
the problem is:
six month european put on stock K=50 S=50 dividend of 1.50 paid at t=4 months volatility=.3 continous interest rate r=.05 Setting S'=S-1.5exp(-.05*4/12) and using .3 as the volatility yields 4.19 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
How to explain actuarial exams to someone else... Good Einstein quote - "One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind for the examinations, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year." |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the OP referring to using Schroder's Method to switch between the Forward and Stock volatilities? Also, wasn't that removed from the syllabus? Therefore, we can trust that whatever volatility is provided can be used as-is.
Is this correct? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
How to explain actuarial exams to someone else... Good Einstein quote - "One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind for the examinations, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year." |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is it? some of the TIA exams have binomial trees based on forward prices (usually ask you to price an american call w a discrete div in there), where you haveto obtain
sigma_F = sigma_S*S(0)/F(0) and determine u, d, p* using that. are these just outdated questions? Though Ive never seen a problem where volatility must be adjusted in the BS Framework Last edited by ActuarialHeroOfTime; 04-30-2009 at 10:40 AM.. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh good so I didn't waste 3 hours on it last night
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|