![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Simple question (I think)! If we have the following equation for which we needed the IRR, could we just use our trusty BA II+ and write the answer below and receive full credit?
Equation: -100 - 26v + 124v^2 + 31v^3 = 0 Below this equation, I would write the following on my answer sheet: "Using the BAII+ Cash Flow Function CF0 = (-100) CF1 = (-26) CF2 = 124 CF3 = 31 [IRR] [CPT] ==> IRR = 10.948%" Is this too much, too little, just right? |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's way too much. Just the formula and the solution are fine. maybe write "using ba2+ IRR function," but I'd even leave that out, personally.
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
And you would all get it wrong.
Spoiler: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|