Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams - General > Discussion of Actual Candidate Papers > Part 9
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs
Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-13-2009, 05:03 PM
Retriever's Avatar
Retriever Retriever is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Studying for the last friggin' time!
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Roth View Post
I haven't verified with the graders, but I think it's appropriate to expect that the .25 point lost was not because of rounding to the nearest thousand. It was for incorrectly performing the rounding.

The candidate wrote the MSL is 208,050, but then brought 208.5K into the calculation. This is incorrect. Such a mistake is essentially equivalent to a missed calculator punch, which, as noted already in this discussion, will cost you .25 point. Any of 208050, 208k or 208.1k should have been acceptable.
Great, thank you for your prompt response! I appreciate you clearing this up.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-20-2009, 07:07 PM
Retriever's Avatar
Retriever Retriever is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Studying for the last friggin' time!
Posts: 363
Default

Simple question (I think)! If we have the following equation for which we needed the IRR, could we just use our trusty BA II+ and write the answer below and receive full credit?

Equation: -100 - 26v + 124v^2 + 31v^3 = 0

Below this equation, I would write the following on my answer sheet:

"Using the BAII+ Cash Flow Function
CF0 = (-100)
CF1 = (-26)
CF2 = 124
CF3 = 31
[IRR] [CPT] ==> IRR = 10.948%"

Is this too much, too little, just right?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-20-2009, 09:52 PM
MyKenk's Avatar
MyKenk MyKenk is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: http://mhenk.blogspot.com
Studying for CAS 9/8/whatever?
College: Drake '06
Posts: 8,519
Default

That's way too much. Just the formula and the solution are fine. maybe write "using ba2+ IRR function," but I'd even leave that out, personally.
__________________
Twitter!

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:07 PM
triplea's Avatar
triplea triplea is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Studying for Exam Committee
Posts: 4,922
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I would just write "using calculator, v = "
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-21-2009, 11:45 AM
Colymbosathon ecplecticos Colymbosathon ecplecticos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,988
Default

And you would all get it wrong.

Spoiler:
IRR is an interest rate not a discount rate. You need to use Exam 2 methods to turn i into v.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-21-2009, 11:49 AM
MyKenk's Avatar
MyKenk MyKenk is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: http://mhenk.blogspot.com
Studying for CAS 9/8/whatever?
College: Drake '06
Posts: 8,519
Default

Not if you use a calculator. Put in the cash flows, it gives you IRR, not V.
__________________
Twitter!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.13978 seconds with 7 queries