Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 4/C - Construction and Evaluation of Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of DW Simpson
Patty Jacobsen Simpson, Bob Morand, Kristyn Sakelaris, Sean Loboda, KC Cho, Maureen Matous, Ellen Page
Aaron Benton, Becki Tobia, Kimberly Skora, Margit Vogele, Barclay Burns, Jason Blundy, Dan Karrow, Tom Troceen
Valorie Mulder, Marianne Westphal, Carol Lee, Jennifer Retford, Kieran Welsh-Phillips, Lindsey Nelson, Emily Paxton
Angie Wachholz, Derek Mulder, Julie Garwood, Caitlin Cunningham, David Benton, Dave Retford, Sarah Cleveland, Rhonda Glick
Genevieve Shannon, Meghan Bautista, Carol Datu, Barb Rave, Jesus Perez, Dan Kane, Chris Zdenek, Scott Simon, Kriss Wells


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:11 PM
allenlod allenlod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 107
Default Spring 2007 Exam, q.26

The question is as follows:

"The following table was calculated based on loss amounts for a group of motorcycle insurance policies:

cj dj uj xj Pj
250 6 0 1 0
500 6 0 2 5
1000 7 1 4 9
2750 0 1 7 11
5500 0 1 1 3
6000 0 0 1 1
10,000 0 0 0 0

You are given α= 1 and β= 0.


Using the procedure in the Loss Models text, estimate the probability that a policy with a deductible of 500 will have a claim payment in excess of 5500."

The solution computed S(500) by taking the Kaplan-Meier estimate at the 250 deductible line but not including the 500 deductible line. I had 3 questions:

1. Why wasn't the information at the 500 line incorporated in calculating S(500)?
2. Is there a way to word the question differently so that the information at the 500 line would be included?
3. If I faced a similar situation with a Nelson-Aalen equivalent, would this still be the case?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:55 PM
Sophie H. Sophie H. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Studying for FAP FA
Posts: 572
Default

1. given d=500 means data at 500 are truncated.
so, the $500 losses assumed to happen between 500 and 1000 and you include the $500 losses information in the next interval S(1000) (or S(2750)...,etc) .

i'll save the latter two questions for the next person
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:35 PM
GooseyGoose's Avatar
GooseyGoose GooseyGoose is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,029
Default

2. Not really. You can make the deductible 499 or less.
3. Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009, 04:43 PM
allenlod allenlod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 107
Default

Thanks to the both of you for the help
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:31 PM
Rushfan70 Rushfan70 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 141
Default

I still can't see why S(500) isn't 5/6 * 9/11
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 07:26 PM
uclatommy uclatommy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 230
Default

I would tend to agree that the definition of S(500) is Pr(t>500) rather than Pr(t>=500) so it seems strange that they would not include the deaths at time 500 to calculate S(500). Anyone have insights?
__________________
VEE Econ VEE Stat VEE Finance P/1 FM/2 MFE/3F MLC C/4 FAP IA FAP FA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 07:42 PM
chopsuey chopsuey is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Favorite beer: I'll have a Sam Adams please
Posts: 205
Default

what does the a = 1 b = 0 notation stand for?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:01 PM
Clam Chowdah's Avatar
Clam Chowdah Clam Chowdah is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Derry, ME
Studying for CAS 5
Favorite beer: Pick Pole Pale Ale
Posts: 1,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chopsuey View Post
what does the a = 1 b = 0 notation stand for?
http://www.aceyourexams.net/errata/E...009Changes.pdf

Quote:
Also, the material on Approximations for Large Data Sets (Lesson 25) no longer uses , , and Pj notation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:03 PM
chopsuey chopsuey is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Favorite beer: I'll have a Sam Adams please
Posts: 205
Default

tyvm
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-05-2009, 11:35 PM
Rushfan70 Rushfan70 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 141
Default

Digging into this, I found that, ironically, Stu liked this problem enough to put it exactly in the exercises of the new LM edition (14.35). I have the solutions manual, but it sheds no more light than Broverman.

Apparently large data sets with ranges (cj , cj+1), S(cj) stops at (cj-1 , cj). As the saying goes, with mathematics, you don't learn things, you just get used to them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.16882 seconds with 7 queries