![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I completed the spreadsheets 9 and 10 according to the instructions in the yellow boxes, but for both sheets I'm seeing a 1st year profit of about -$1M (specifically -$0.8M for spdst 9 and -$1M for spdst 10).
Comparing this to what Asherton told us that their "projected vs. actual" earnings in 2001 were (on the first page of the pdf), I am a bit confused. The model is showing a negative first year profit, yet he claimed that they had a profit of almost half a million. This does not seem right to me. Did anyone else compare these numbers...what did you think?
__________________
"One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind for the examinations, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year." ~Einstein
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're not going to tie out. Those earnings are in aggregate and as the total # of policies increase each year so does the initial strain from the commissions and the UW costs. We only have 1 year of sales to calculate and no previous years to offset the loss.
I wish my question had a simple fix like yours. I'm rocking a -25% profit over premium ratio on my end. I can't find a single mistake in my model but it must be there.
__________________
- Horseface An argument without the devil's advocate is really just a nice warm hug. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| eom4 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|