![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
| Finance - Investments Sub-forum: Non-Actuarial Personal Finance/Investing |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Today's challenge - come up with a better formula/definition for losses in the Madoff fraud:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/bu...l?ref=business Quote:
Anybody got a better formula? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
1) I don't think the government should be reimbursing anyone for fictional losses.
2) I do think Madoff should be liable for the opportunity cost of the money. I don't know how to define that, however. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
So, how much assets - real assets - did Madoff have at the time of conviction?
Seems to me the best one can get is percentage amount claims of Madoff's assets. I've seen a few articles where some Madoff investors who cashed out early are paying off those who got burned, but I'm not sure how kosher that is. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| fraud, madoff |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|