Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models > CAS 3 - specific material
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs

Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


CAS 3 - specific material Please keep posts regarding material common to both exams in the upper forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:32 PM
spencerhs5's Avatar
spencerhs5 spencerhs5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesusislord View Post
yea i just created a matrix with 0s, 1s and 2s in the rows and columns. then filled in the approp numbers. i got like 7.11111 for the chi square stat. then if you look it up on the table it had 4 dof. so it was less than the 95% critical value. so i choose E.
damn thats what i did and second guessed myself on... i thinmk my stat was 6.8 something though, but either way it was E
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:32 PM
jesusislord jesusislord is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Studying for none
Posts: 1,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spencerhs5 View Post
was the 10 pay whole life something special for h pay? i just did u/(u+d)=(1-e^(-nd))/d)*X and solved for X where d is delta not discount
that question was str8 forward premium calculation. it was a 10 pay whole life continious insurance. so solve for whole life and a 10 yr temporary continious annuity. divide and there you go.
__________________
God is real and His love is unconditional.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:33 PM
spencerhs5's Avatar
spencerhs5 spencerhs5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesusislord View Post
did any1 try that stupid unbiased estimator question. i kept looking at it over and over. never did come up with a conclusion or a guess.
option two was the only one that summed to 1 which would be 1 theta -theta =0 so unbiasted.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:33 PM
jesusislord jesusislord is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Studying for none
Posts: 1,258
Default

did any1 get a ton of C's?
__________________
God is real and His love is unconditional.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:34 PM
jesusislord jesusislord is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Studying for none
Posts: 1,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spencerhs5 View Post
option two was the only one that summed to 1 which would be 1 theta -theta =0 so unbiasted.
yea i summed them all up but that was about as far as i got. o well.
__________________
God is real and His love is unconditional.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:34 PM
spencerhs5's Avatar
spencerhs5 spencerhs5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesusislord View Post
did any1 get a ton of C's?
First 3 were C, many C's A's and E's only 1 or two b's and d's it seemed like
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:35 PM
aorl aorl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Studying for fun
Favorite beer: cold
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesusislord View Post
did any1 try that stupid unbiased estimator question. i kept looking at it over and over. never did come up with a conclusion or a guess.
Yeah at first I did a WTF and skipped it, but then I realized that it just wanted E(theta hat) = theta, and since E(X) = theta,

E(theta hat) = E(sum(a_i * x_i))
= sum(a_i * theta) <=because E[x_i] = theta
so then the a_i's just have to sum to 1 to get E[theta hat] = theta

right?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:35 PM
(/iropracy's Avatar
(/iropracy (/iropracy is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East
College: Post Graduate
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spencerhs5 View Post
option two was the only one that summed to 1 which would be 1 theta -theta =0 so unbiasted.
Mathematically sound I thought... I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:36 PM
(/iropracy's Avatar
(/iropracy (/iropracy is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East
College: Post Graduate
Posts: 374
Default

Many C's
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-07-2010, 06:37 PM
aorl aorl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Studying for fun
Favorite beer: cold
Posts: 168
Default

I now realize I got the chi-sq matrix question wrong. I picked A.

Also felt like I got a ton of C's, but I only got 8 in reality. Which is well above expected C's, but it felt like more than 8.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.36090 seconds with 7 queries