Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > General Actuarial
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson & Company International Actuary Jobs
  Canada  Asia  Australia  Life  Pension  Casualty
Bermuda, United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, Worldwide


General Actuarial Non-Specific Actuarial Topics - Before posting a thread, please browse over our other sections to see if there is a better fit, such as Careers - Employment, Actuarial Science Universities Forum or any of our other 100+ forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2010, 04:18 PM
DeaconMet DeaconMet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 432
Default Return premiums?

How would anyone interpret the term return premiums in this sentence fragment:

a tax of six percent on the direct premiums, less return premiums and exclusive of sums collected to cover state or federal taxes, on surplus line insurance subject to tax transacted by the broker during the preceding calendar year as shown by the annual statement filed with the commissioner.

To me it seems to be claim payments; Am I correct?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2010, 04:24 PM
Stanley Milgram's Avatar
Stanley Milgram Stanley Milgram is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Favorite beer: "Trying" to choose yoga over beer.
Posts: 4,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconMet View Post
How would anyone interpret the term return premiums in this sentence fragment:

a tax of six percent on the direct premiums, less return premiums and exclusive of sums collected to cover state or federal taxes, on surplus line insurance subject to tax transacted by the broker during the preceding calendar year as shown by the annual statement filed with the commissioner.

To me it seems to be claim payments; Am I correct?
Jeez, sentences like that make me hate insurance.

No. It's not claim payments. I assume it refers to endorsements.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2010, 04:46 PM
the BS method's Avatar
the BS method the BS method is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,815
Default

yeesh.

'direct premiums less return premiums', i would think that's an awful way of saying earned premium.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2010, 08:20 AM
jerrytuttle jerrytuttle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Platinum Underwriters Re
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconMet View Post
How would anyone interpret the term return premiums in this sentence fragment:

a tax of six percent on the direct premiums, less return premiums and exclusive of sums collected to cover state or federal taxes, on surplus line insurance subject to tax transacted by the broker during the preceding calendar year as shown by the annual statement filed with the commissioner.

To me it seems to be claim payments; Am I correct?

Suppose the original premium were $100. If $5 were returned to the insured for any reason, such as a mid-term endorsement involving a reduction in coverage, then the tax is payable on the $95.
__________________
Thanks,
Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2010, 08:37 AM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for CPD
Posts: 29,642
Default

Jerry is right. So is Stanley. It's NOT claims, it's any sort of premium refund.
__________________
Carol Marler, FSA, MAAA, A Dedicated Actuary
Just My Opinion (Although this statement is my opinion, and I am an actuary, it's still not a statement of actuarial opinion, and you really shouldn't rely on it.)

Updated quotes Apr 4:
Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
Actuaries (as a general rule) are uniquely UNqualified to work with derivatives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
learning what the data are, what they mean, why they are plural, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamTheEagle View Post
StompStomp kept saying "Happy Day!" rather than Happy Birthday. It was cute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck View Post
Machines do not make human-errors but make machine-errors; humans do not make machine-errors but make human-errors ... even when the technology is there, it'd be a tough call as to which makes driving safer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klaymen View Post
Life is a bunch of IF statements
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2010, 09:46 AM
MightySchoop's Avatar
MightySchoop MightySchoop is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: the freekin' moon!
Posts: 3,222
Default

I would assume it referred to commercial P&C lines with an audit, like Work Comp or some General Liability. The exposure base is something like payroll or sales and is not actually known until after the policy expires.

It's estimated up front and a premium set. If the premium audit shows an exposure base less than the estimate, a return premium is sent to the insured. No endorsement necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2010, 12:58 PM
Brad Gile's Avatar
Brad Gile Brad Gile is offline
Member
CAS SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Studying for whatever I feel like
College: Alumnus of Brown and UW-Madison
Posts: 11,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MightySchoop View Post
I would assume it referred to commercial P&C lines with an audit, like Work Comp or some General Liability. The exposure base is something like payroll or sales and is not actually known until after the policy expires.

It's estimated up front and a premium set. If the premium audit shows an exposure base less than the estimate, a return premium is sent to the insured. No endorsement necessary.
Actually, I believe that the term "return premium" is general and applies to all lines of insurance.
__________________
Brad Gile, FSA, MAAA
Affiliate Member of the CAS
Dedicated Retired Actuary

Spoiler:
Obama sucks and we all know it-TDA


Spoiler:

That's been the funniest subplot of this whole thing, the people on the left attacking this bill for not being even more of a steaming pile. - erosewater
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-04-2010, 02:55 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for CPD
Posts: 29,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Gile View Post
Actually, I believe that the term "return premium" is general and applies to all lines of insurance.
I agree. I've seen similar language for annuities, for example.
__________________
Carol Marler, FSA, MAAA, A Dedicated Actuary
Just My Opinion (Although this statement is my opinion, and I am an actuary, it's still not a statement of actuarial opinion, and you really shouldn't rely on it.)

Updated quotes Apr 4:
Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
Actuaries (as a general rule) are uniquely UNqualified to work with derivatives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
learning what the data are, what they mean, why they are plural, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamTheEagle View Post
StompStomp kept saying "Happy Day!" rather than Happy Birthday. It was cute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck View Post
Machines do not make human-errors but make machine-errors; humans do not make machine-errors but make human-errors ... even when the technology is there, it'd be a tough call as to which makes driving safer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klaymen View Post
Life is a bunch of IF statements
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:00 AM
Shaft's Avatar
Shaft Shaft is offline
Member
CAS SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrytuttle View Post
Suppose the original premium were $100. If $5 were returned to the insured for any reason, such as a mid-term endorsement involving a reduction in coverage, then the tax is payable on the $95.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMO View Post
Jerry is right. So is Stanley. It's NOT claims, it's any sort of premium refund.
Agree with the above.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:37 AM
California's Avatar
California California is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Default Context helps to clarify your question

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconMet View Post
How would anyone interpret the term return premiums in this sentence fragment:

a tax of six percent on the direct premiums, less return premiums and exclusive of sums collected to cover state or federal taxes, on surplus line insurance subject to tax transacted by the broker during the preceding calendar year as shown by the annual statement filed with the commissioner.

To me it seems to be claim payments; Am I correct?
I will provide an example in a vacuum based upon an assumption. Actuaries like to make assumptions.

I buy a car and for some reason accept the credit insurance. A month later I come to my senses and ask for a refund of the unearned premium. What I get back is my return premium.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.40745 seconds with 7 queries