![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Registration Form |
D.W. Simpson |
Australia Jobs | Pension |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, I've read through almost all the discussions on EOM 4, and I still couldn't figure out the errors in my calculation.
For EOM 4, I got the profit as premium to be around 28% which is definitely too high. But I think I carefully followed the instructions. I really appreciate any hints on where I messed up. Here is my calculation for band one. Policies sold 20,000 Face amount in $000 is 1,000,000. total premium collected 1,800,000. Face amount BOY 1,000,000 reserve BOY 0 reserve EOY -3,276,146 Premium collected 1,800,000 underwriting expense 2,000,000 commission bonus 2,700,000 interest on BOY reserve 0 Interst on Cash flow -174,000 death claim 413,000 (in $) Total cash flow -3,487,000 increase in reserve -3,276,146 profit -210,854 using the same calculation, 2nd year death claim is 545,075 and profit is 37,241 3rd year death claim is 611309, and profit is 79,572 total profit as % of premium for the 10 year period is 27.98%. I've seen people mentioned the 1000 factor for mortality, my understanding is that the given mortality is for 1000 and the face amount is also in 1000, so to get the actual death claim amount in $. So I simply multiply the 70% adjusted mortality 0.413 for 1st year with the face amount 1,000,000. If I want to convert everything to 1$, then I can divide 0.413 by 1000 and at the same time use the real face amount of $1,000,000,000, then I will get exactly the same profit and death claim amount because the 1000s cancel out. I know I must have missed something obvious because everyone seems to get around 5% profit. Any hint is appreciated. Thanks, Joseph |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you talking about tasks 3 and 4? I think the first problem is that you aren't using the correct policies sold, face amount, and premium collected. It says in the memo on page 5 (the last bullet point at toward the end) that you are supposed to assume the amount of new business is the same as for 2005. I think you are using the 2001 numbers. So for band 1 that would be 27,000 polices sold not 20,000 etc for the face amount and premium.
I went back and changed my numbers to match what you were doing and I got the rest my numbers to match yours but my profit still isn't higher than 5%. Is the profit you listed just for band 1? Maybe if you give those numbers I could help more. Last edited by amyb2332; 07-24-2010 at 04:48 PM.. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for taking the time to respond. But no matter how many policies are sold, the percentage of profit to premium should be the same. I used 20,000 policies sold as an example to show some real numbers. Do you think I got the mortality right? BTW, I used 2005 sales numbers (amount sold, premium, and # of policies sold), I got the same profit as % of premium. Thanks, Joseph Last edited by Joseph_Z; 07-24-2010 at 04:54 PM.. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think you are doing the mortality correctly. For the second year my mortality matches what you have. I didn't notice this the first time but I'm actually not matching your second year profit. I matched the first year profit but not the second. I got 156,278 for second year profit and 147,460 for 3rd year profit.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here are my 2nd year numbers (using 1,000,000 as original face amount) Face amount BOY 949,608 reserve BOY -3,276,146 reserve EOY -2,243,179 Premium collected 1,709,294 underwriting expense 0 commission bonus 0 interest on BOY reserve (196,569) Interest on Cash flow 102,558 death claim 545,075 (in $) Total cash flow 1,070,208 increase in reserve 1,032,967 profit 37,241 3rd year Face amount BOY 856,175 reserve BOY (2,243,179) reserve EOY (1,348,380) Premium collected 1,622,897 underwriting expense 0 commission bonus 0 interest on BOY reserve (134,591) Interest on Cash flow 97,374 death claim 611,309 (in $) Total cash flow 974,371 increase in reserve 894,799 profit 79,572 Thanks a lot! Joseph |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
For band 1 my % of profit is 5.22%, band 2 is 5.41%, band 3 is 4.7% and the overall is 5.03%.
My end of year reserves in year 2 don't match yours and then that is throwing off some other stuff. I know that I played around the the lapse rate for one of the tasks though so that could be why we aren't matching. And it still shouldn't explain the high % of profit you are seeing. I'm kind of at a loss! Sorry! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The mortality is fine, don't forget to divide by 1000 somewhere along in your calculations, that's a common hiccup.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for taking the time to reply. Joseph |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry, I don't remember specifically, I just remember people not coming up with the right returns because they forgot to add 1/1000 somewhere in there calcs. What's your lapse rates? Been a while for me.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My lapse rate was 5% for all years. But even a change from 5% to 10% in my calc won't reduce the profit % from ~28% to 5%. What did you use for the recommended mortality in part 1 and 2. Is it still around 70% of CIA 86-92 table? Thanks, Joseph Last edited by Joseph_Z; 07-25-2010 at 03:55 PM.. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| eom4 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|