Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

United Kingdom
Actuarial Jobs

General Insurance, Life & Other Areas

Canada
Actuarial Jobs

Casualty, Life,
Pension,
Health &
Investment

Entry Level
Actuarial Jobs

All Disciplines
Health, Life, Pension, Casualty, Investment

D.W. Simpson
& Company

Actuarial
Recruiters

Worldwide
www.dwsimpson.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2010, 09:59 PM
jhp8's Avatar
jhp8 jhp8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 278
Default SOA # 175

Question:

A group of 1000 lives each age 30 sets up a fund to pay 1000 at the end of the first year for each member who dies in the first year, and 500 at the end of the second year for each member who dies in the second year. Each member pays into the fund an amount equal to the single benefit premium for a special 2-year term insurance, with:

(i) Benefits:
k bk +1
0 1000
1 500

(ii) Mortality follows the Illustrative Life Table.

(iii) i = 0.06

The actual experience of the fund is as follows:

k Interest Rate Deaths
0 0.070 1
1 0.069 1

Calculate the difference, at the end of the second year, between the expected size of the fund as projected at time 0 and the actual fund.
*************************************************

I calculate the initial fund to be 2158.85 like the answer key says. However, I don't understand the next step of the solution:

Let Fn denote the size of Fund 1 at the end of year n.
F1=2158.75*(1.07) −1000 = 1309.86
F2=1309.86*(1.065) −500 = 895.00

Why do they use a interest rate of 6.5%? I would think a 6.9% interest rate should be used.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2010, 11:04 PM
Llanowan Llanowan is online now
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Studying for CFA Level III
College: Princeton Alumnus
Favorite beer: Westvleteren 12
Posts: 468
Default

It should be 6.9, it's just an error. If you use 6.9, you'll get:

2158.75(1.07)-1000 = 1309.86
1309.86(1.069) - 500 = 900.24, which still gives you your 900 (C).


If I had my guess, they wrote the question as 6.5% (or perhaps it appeared that way on an exam) and they intended you to round to 900, but when they added it to the sample questions, they backed into the .069 to get an answer closer to 900. (Or maybe it was just an error, who knows!?)
__________________
P   FM   MLC   MFE   C

CFA I   CFA II   CFA III
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2010, 11:11 PM
jhp8's Avatar
jhp8 jhp8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llanowan View Post
It should be 6.9, it's just an error. If you use 6.9, you'll get:

2158.75(1.07)-1000 = 1309.86
1309.86(1.069) - 500 = 900.24, which still gives you your 900 (C).


If I had my guess, they wrote the question as 6.5% (or perhaps it appeared that way on an exam) and they intended you to round to 900, but when they added it to the sample questions, they backed into the .069 to get an answer closer to 900. (Or maybe it was just an error, who knows!?)
Thanks. For some reason I thought 895 was a answer choice (Which it is not) and thought I was getting the sucker answer. I wish they would fix their solution, I wasted to much time on that!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2012, 05:25 AM
georgestouma georgestouma is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Studying for C
College: Postgraduate
Posts: 457
Default

why the expected fund at end of year 2 is 0 ? So they are using the reserve at time 2 witch need the mortality .. Why in the solution in F1 they didnt divide by (1-0.001) ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:07 AM
nin01001 nin01001 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 45
Default

The expected fund is being set up with equivalence in mind, so they are collecting just what they need to end with 0.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-07-2012, 04:34 PM
georgestouma georgestouma is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Studying for C
College: Postgraduate
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nin01001 View Post
The expected fund is being set up with equivalence in mind, so they are collecting just what they need to end with 0.
Thanks. But why they are not using the same way in expecting in the fund , they didnt divide it by Px =1-0.001 =one per 1000 die
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.24791 seconds with 7 queries