Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams > Exam 8 (old Part 9) - Advanced Ratemaking
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2010, 06:56 PM
lisa2008 lisa2008 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Default The NCCI 1998 adjustment

There is something I suddenly become unsure about just one day before the exam: The NCCI 1998 adjustment makes the primary-excess loss split inflation-sensitive (I assume the adjustment is made to the 1991 single split plan), then how come the primary loss Ap is always limited to $5000? Shouldn't this limit increase each year with inflation?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2010, 06:58 PM
Debaser's Avatar
Debaser Debaser is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Favorite beer: full sail pale ale
Posts: 528
Default

It can increase, but it hasn't historically. (I forget which paper says that, maybe someone else can help me out here.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2010, 06:58 PM
UglyChristmasSweater UglyChristmasSweater is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lisa2008 View Post
There is something I suddenly become unsure about just one day before the exam: The NCCI 1998 adjustment makes the primary-excess loss split inflation-sensitive (I assume the adjustment is made to the 1991 single split plan), then how come the primary loss Ap is always limited to $5000? Shouldn't this limit increase each year with inflation?
As far as this exam is concerned, it is currently still $5000, but it will increase with inflation in the near future.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2010, 07:12 PM
tometom's Avatar
tometom tometom is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Favorite beer: Homebrew
Posts: 6,809
Default

Agreed, it hasn't been raised yet. It must be raised in $500 increments, so maybe there hasn't been justification for it to be raised by that much yet. But if I were a betting man, that probably isn't the reason.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2010, 07:13 PM
UglyChristmasSweater UglyChristmasSweater is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tometom View Post
Agreed, it hasn't been raised yet. It must be raised in $500 increments, so maybe there hasn't been justification for it to be raised by that much yet. But if I were a betting man, that probably isn't the reason.
great point, I forgot that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.33751 seconds with 7 queries