![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Supposedly at 11:30 ET today. Why not a pay reduction? Are they going to go work somewhere else? But I'll take it.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does that include Congress?
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body; but rather, to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow, what a ride!" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's probably not within his authority.
How 'bout a hiring freeze or a 10% RIF? I suppose the new Congress could make it academic. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
freeze wages at an all time high!
perfect timing if you are an employee of the gov't. JSAs get no jobs, you get peak earning!
__________________
It matters not if your shepard is a repub or a demo. Either way you are a jacksheepleass incapable of thinking for yourself. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40416771
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1, cut 2% a year until they all start leaving for the private sector and then go back up 2%. That is your equilibrium.
__________________
Listen to me now and hear me later. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() And why would that even be your goal in the first place? That only makes sense if you actually want to retain the current number of government employees. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Saving $2B in fiscal year 2011, based on 3,000,000 federal employees is
2*10^9 / 3 * 10^6 = $667 per employee for the 2011 fiscal year. If that would have been a 3% increase otherwise, that implies and average salary of $667 / 0.03 = $22,222. 1% implies $66,667. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rich get richer, poor get poorer. SSDD.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|