Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of DW Simpson
Patty Jacobsen Simpson, Bob Morand, Kristyn Sakelaris, Sean Loboda, KC Cho, Maureen Matous, Ellen Page
Aaron Benton, Becki Tobia, Kimberly Skora, Margit Vogele, Barclay Burns, Jason Blundy, Dan Karrow, Tom Troceen
Valorie Mulder, Marianne Westphal, Carol Lee, Jennifer Retford, Kieran Welsh-Phillips, Lindsey Nelson, Emily Paxton
Angie Wachholz, Derek Mulder, Julie Garwood, Caitlin Cunningham, David Benton, Dave Retford, Sarah Cleveland, Rhonda Glick
Genevieve Shannon, Meghan Bautista, Carol Datu, Barb Rave, Jesus Perez, Dan Kane, Chris Zdenek, Scott Simon, Kriss Wells


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2011, 04:12 PM
ap07 ap07 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11
Default Exam P advice

Hi guys,

I am an Economics/Finance major with an expected graduation date of May 2012. I have been considering taking exam P in May to show employers I am serious about the Actuarial profession. I have a decent math background having taken Intro to Statistics, Business Statistics, Mathematical Economics, Econometrics, and am currently taking Calculus. I was just wondering if I would have a pretty good chance of passing exam P in May (assuming I study my butt off for the next 2 months). I plan on buying the ACTEX study guide (since that seems to be the best one for exam P) and doing all of the free sample exams/problems you can find online. What do you guys think? Do you have any suggestions for me going forward? Any advice/input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks guys

Last edited by ap07; 02-14-2011 at 04:37 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2011, 04:29 PM
Fianchetto's Avatar
Fianchetto Fianchetto is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: On the diagonal
Studying for 4C
Favorite beer: Boulevard Irish Ale
Posts: 199
Default

You could definitely pass. Put in 100 - 300 hours (depending on how easily it turns out to be for you) and with your background you'll put yourself in prime position to pass.
__________________
................
P FM 3F 3L C
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2011, 05:47 PM
Robot_Insurance Robot_Insurance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 313
Default

Yeah, you shouldn't have a problem but you have to prepare more than you think you have to. There WILL be topics that you have never seen before despite multiple stats classes (Gamma distribution, joint distributions, MGF functions come to mind) and there is no way around memorizing many formulas.

I would also be worried about "currently taking calculus." You have to be pretty comfortable with double integrals for any joint distribution problems. If you only have had single-variable calculus, then that will be another thing that will take a lot of time to learn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2011, 06:41 PM
mathmajor's Avatar
mathmajor mathmajor is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nowhere in particular
Studying for Modules & DMAC
College: B.S. Applied Math
Favorite beer: Vegas Bomb
Posts: 5,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robot_Insurance View Post
Yeah, you shouldn't have a problem but you have to prepare more than you think you have to. There WILL be topics that you have never seen before despite multiple stats classes (Gamma distribution, joint distributions, MGF functions come to mind) and there is no way around memorizing many formulas.

I would also be worried about "currently taking calculus." You have to be pretty comfortable with double integrals for any joint distribution problems. If you only have had single-variable calculus, then that will be another thing that will take a lot of time to learn.

Totally agree. P will not come as easy as, say, FM might. (I was a math major so it was opposite for me!) Even after completing your calc course, there will be more to learn. I would recommend before taking P to take 1) a calc-based stats course and 2) more advanced calculus.

However, you'll probably have an easy time with FM (interest, annuities, etc) and could take that first. It has basic stats and little calculus on it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2011, 01:54 AM
Noumenon84's Avatar
Noumenon84 Noumenon84 is offline
Philosopher King
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Studying for FAP.... eventually
Posts: 954
Default

I had only taken a calc 2 class when I passed P. The amount of "multi variable" calculus you need you can teach yourself. The application is limited to certain types of questions.

IMO, what makes these exams difficult is the amount of material on each exam and the unlimited ways they can test every topic more so than the material itself. Though, that's not to say the material is easy. Just put in your 100-300 study hours like someone else suggested and you'll have a good shot at passing.

Good luck!
__________________
Sum ergo Cogito

P FM MLC MFE C

Last edited by Noumenon84; 02-15-2011 at 01:57 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2011, 02:24 AM
herrMrtn herrMrtn is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Alberta
Studying for CAS 5
College: University of British Columbia '10
Posts: 221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noumenon84 View Post
I had only taken a calc 2 class when I passed P. The amount of "multi variable" calculus you need you can teach yourself. The application is limited to certain types of questions.


The importance of multivariable calc is secondary.
__________________
1/P 2/FM 3L/MLC 3F/MFE 4/C ASA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2011, 11:08 AM
mathmajor's Avatar
mathmajor mathmajor is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nowhere in particular
Studying for Modules & DMAC
College: B.S. Applied Math
Favorite beer: Vegas Bomb
Posts: 5,430
Default

I'm a bit surprised nobody else is advocating taking FM first and doing more coursework. Am I just crazy?
__________________
G&H DP | G&H Adv
HF | FHE | PRF| DMAC

Actuarial Scientist
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2011, 11:14 AM
TheMJ's Avatar
TheMJ TheMJ is offline
Note Contributor
SOA
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Studying for MFE
Posts: 512
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathmajor View Post
I'm a bit surprised nobody else is advocating taking FM first and doing more coursework. Am I just crazy?
No you're not. It might be true that the need for multivariable calc is limited to certain topics, but more knowledge wont hurt. Besides, the poster's situation makes it easier for him to sit for FM first since he has that info relatively fresh.
__________________
TheMJ, formerly known as CERA-SEEKER

P FM MFE MLC C
VEEs: Economics App. Statistics Corporate Finance
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-15-2011, 01:32 PM
mathmajor's Avatar
mathmajor mathmajor is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nowhere in particular
Studying for Modules & DMAC
College: B.S. Applied Math
Favorite beer: Vegas Bomb
Posts: 5,430
Default

Well as I mentioned, it would be helpful to have a calc-based stats course (not just basic stats). Also I don't know about you, but I didn't learn the calculus involving e^x, a^x, and ln(x) until calc 2. Those are important.
__________________
G&H DP | G&H Adv
HF | FHE | PRF| DMAC

Actuarial Scientist
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-15-2011, 05:58 PM
TrueCaleb's Avatar
TrueCaleb TrueCaleb is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Favorite beer: Root Beer
Posts: 200
Default

I'd definitely recommend taking FM first. Get the ASM study manual for FM.
__________________
Why did the actuary cross the road?
...to get to the other side!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.22955 seconds with 7 queries