Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Diversions > Chess
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Bengaluru - Chennai - Hyderabad - Pune
Actuarial Jobs in India
New Delhi - Mumbai - Gurgaon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 07-27-2011, 01:59 PM
ActWaryAlways ActWaryAlways is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Studying for FAP Modules
College: Humor
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delothus View Post
I was very upset over my 33... Nd5 blunder

I had very strong reasons for 32 ...h5 though

After your 32 kf1 I evaluated the position like this.

If I try and hold the b pawn, you pin me down very passively/restricted and can slowly build/maneuver into a position of dominance.

If I play actively instead and concede the b pawn I can at least force you to consider the full board at a minimum. But looking ahead I do not want to play:

a) a pure pawn ending with the remaining pawn structure.
b) knight vs bishop ending

I also thought it reasonable I could probably force you to exchange bishop for my knight at some point.

So assuming all the above, If there are further exchanges I am willing to go to a Rook vs Rook ending where you have the passed 'a' pawn. Without a lot of detail, in that situation the thematic pawn structure that is strongest for the defender is h5, g6 and f7 and my rook behind your pawn. It is a pretty straight forward drawing technique. And seeing as I needed an escape for my King at the moment I went h5 on move 32, full planning to most likely go
g6 on move 33 ( instead of the abysmal nd5 which I obviously didn't look twice at your response only thinking you drop the rook. Instead, I thought you would probably go NR-N2 and I planned R-Q6 which might be too risky but could also cause you tons of problems). In any event, after 32 h5 and 33 g6 I have my pawns in the thematic position, I don't think your white square bishop can exploit them in this situation and I can focus on counter play.

Now my maybe my strategic analysis is wrong, but I could live with that and would actually enjoy being given a lesson in why it was wrong over the board so to speak.

I detest playing like a patzer and uopsets me to no end how pathetic some of my moves are at times.

Good game though and good luck!

With 33 .. Nd5, R6b2, and Rd3, I once again have Bxd5 with the check and taking on d3. But I do understand theme that you were trying to play, hence why I thought 32 .. g6 first, and then follow it up with h5 (avoiding the cheap tactic)

My plan would've been to reorganize my bishop to maybe b3 in order to support the pawn movement to queening (and avoid the knight trade) and play something like g3 to prevent Nf4 stuff in the future. I wouldn't even mind sacrifcing my d4 pawn to avoid the trade now that I have the passed a-pawn.

However, I agree that if the bishop and knight are traded, the rook endgame is very drawish which is what I saw before when I said it was very balanced. Sorry to hear about the rest of your games . Hopefully we'll play again in the future!
__________________
P FM MLC MFE C EOM 1-5 IA EOM 6-8 FA
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:04 AM
ActWaryAlways ActWaryAlways is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Studying for FAP Modules
College: Humor
Posts: 545
Default

Lost with black against BucketHead. Missed a small 2-move tactic that won a piece, nicely played!

Spoiler:

Move White Black
1 e2-e4 e7-e6
2 d2-d4 d7-d5
3 Nb1-d2 h7-h6
4 Ng1-f3 Ng8-f6
5 e4-e5 Nf6-d7
6 Bf1-d3 c7-c5
7 c2-c3 Nb8-c6
8 O-O g7-g5
9 d4xc5 g5-g4
10 Nf3-d4 Nc6xe5
11 Bd3-c2 Bf8xc5
12 f2-f4 Ne5-c6
13 Nd2-b3 h6-h5
14 Nb3xc5 Nd7xc5
15 Nd4xc6
1-0


I think I should have gone 10 .. Ndxe5 which was my first instinct, but i under estimated the strength of 12. f4 and 13. Ndb3 which I thought I was fine when I played Ncxe5. 13 .. h5 was obviously the key mistake, but im not a big fan of my position after 13 .. Bb6 either. Thanks for the game!

Thanks to everyone in Group A for the games as well, its been a pleasure . To RSF, thanks again for hosting it, and put me down as "tentative" for the next round, as the timing of when it starts will probably impact my choice.

__________________
P FM MLC MFE C EOM 1-5 IA EOM 6-8 FA
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:15 AM
rekrap's Avatar
rekrap rekrap is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 21,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1695814 View Post
rekrap resigned our game. I was Black.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco View Post
rekrap resigned to me as black, thanks for the game.

Good game, gentlemen.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 07-29-2011, 12:29 AM
Buckethead's Avatar
Buckethead Buckethead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ActWaryAlways View Post
Lost with black against BucketHead. Missed a small 2-move tactic that won a piece, nicely played!
GG AWA.

Game began with the french and I decided to use the Tarrasch Variation with 3.Nd2. I try to avoid the main lines of the french, especially the exchange variation if I'm white at all costs.

After 3.Nd2 h6?! I was totally confused. I looked up some games with GM Morozevich which proved it wasn't totally crazy.

I kept it simple with 4.Nf3 and after ... Nf6 5.e5 we transposed into what I believed was a favorable transposition of the advance variation.

Rybka suggests 6.c4 to break at the top which I found interesting and didn't consider.

We were pretty equal and black even had a small advantage after I moved 9.dxc5 which I still like for a number of reasons. But then 9...g4 was the beginning of strategy that ultimately led to the end for black. As this pawn would become extremely hard to back up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ActWaryAlways View Post
I think I should have gone 10 .. Ndxe5 which was my first instinct, but i under estimated the strength of 12. f4 and 13. Ndb3 which I thought I was fine when I played Ncxe5. 13 .. h5 was obviously the key mistake, but im not a big fan of my position after 13 .. Bb6 either. Thanks for the game!

I ran the game through Rybka and it agrees with you that 10..Ndxe5 was the better move, but only by .1 pawn.

+.25/21 10. ... Ndxe5 11.N2b3 Nxd3 12.Qxd3 e5 13.Re1 Bg7 14.Nb5 0-0 15.Nd6 Ne7 16.f4 e4 17.Qe2 b6 18.Be3 Be6 19.Qf2 f5 20.a4 Rb8

After taking the e-pawn I'd be forced to give up the bishop pair and center control. However, in this line, white has access to the d and e semi open files and a strong knight presence on d6. Slow progressing and tight maneuvering game lied ahead.


+0.35/21 11.Bc2 Bxc5 12.f4 Bxd4+ 13.cxd4 Nc6 14.f5 e5 15.Nb3 h5 16.dxe5 Ndxe5 17.Bf4 f6 18.Rc1 Kf7 19.Nc5 Kg7 20.Bb3 Nc4 21.Bxc4
This line, short term, captures the c pawn as well. Rybka suggests trading a good dark squared bishop for my knight which I wouldn't do. However, I'm also not rated 3000+. This line actually demonstrates that the center opens up and my light bishop is actually ineffective as it is left defending the far advanced f pawn. Still white's bishop pair can become very powerful beyond the 21 half move search horizon, even down a pawn.

12. f4 I believe is an unexpected move here and I'm delighted to see that rybka agrees. I probably analyzed about a dozen moves before I looked at this. My position was especially cramped and my center presence was gone. If I hadn't seen this move and moved 12.N2b3, which was my alternate, I believe black would have certainly had an advantage.

after 12..gxf3ep 13. Nxf3 14. Nxf3+ Qxf3 I am clearly better. With 14. N? retreating, I feel much better. and with 12...Nc6 retreating I had some breathing room.

13. Nb3 h5??

This is the move that lost the piece, but I didn't yet realize it. First off, I simply moved Nb3 to threaten your bishop pair which you mentioned that you value highly. I fully expected you to retreat back here. Instead you defend the advanced g pawn which is going to be very difficult to hold on to either way. Second, like I mentioned before, the dark squared bishop is extremely powerful here. It's in the center of the board and pinning my knight. retreating certainly weakens it, I felt like it was only temporary since it is still mobile.

14. Nxc5 Nxc5 as expected and happy to continue the trading with the bishop pair I moved 15. Nxc6 trading knights. It wasn't until after I made this move that I saw 15...bxc6 16.Qd4 winning the knight. It simply fell into my lap, but I'll take it anyhow.

By the way, I wouldn't have given me the benefit of the doubt and resigned before 16.Qd4. I very easily could have missed this--especially over the board. I always prefer to let the other player prove to me that they know what I know before resigning. Even in a king and pawn end game where I know I'm lost, I want to see that the other player knows how to beat me before I resign.

Either way, good game. Looking forward to the next.


PGN w/ Rybka Analsys:

Spoiler:

[ECO "C05"]
[Opening "French"]
[Variation "Tarrasch, Closed, 7.Ngf3"]

1. e4 {(1. ... e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Be7
8.0-0 0-0 9.Nf3 c4 10.Bc2 b5) +0.15/22 300} e6 {(2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5
Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Be7 8.0-0 0-0 9.Nf3 c4 10.Bc2 b5) -0.15/21
300} 2. d4 {(2. ... d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Be7
8.0-0 0-0 9.Nf3 c4 10.Bc2 b5) +0.15/21 300} d5 {(3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3
c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Be7 8.0-0 0-0 9.Nf3 c4 10.Bc2 b5) -0.15/19 300} 3. Nd2
{(3. ... Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Be7 8.0-0 a5 9.Nf3 c4
10.Bc2) +0.15/20 300} h6 {(4.Bd3 c5 5.dxc5 Bxc5 6.Ngf3 Nf6 7.0-0 0-0 8.e5
Nfd7 9.Nb3 Nc6 10.Bf4 Bb6 11.Qe2) -0.19/19 300} 4. Ngf3 {(4. ... Nf6 5.e5
Nfd7 6.c4 Be7 7.Bd3 c5 8.cxd5 exd5 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Re1 c4 11.Bc2 Nb6 12.Nf1
0-0 13.Ne3) +0.18/23 300} Nf6 {(5.e5 Nfd7 6.c4 Be7 7.Bd3 c5 8.cxd5 exd5
9.0-0 Nc6 10.Re1 c4 11.Bc2 Nb6 12.Nf1 0-0 13.Ne3) -0.18/22 300} 5. e5 {(5.
... Nfd7 6.c4 Be7 7.Bd3 c5 8.cxd5 exd5 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Re1 c4 11.Bc2 Nb6
12.Nf1 0-0 13.Ne3) +0.18/23 300} Nfd7 {(6.c4 Be7 7.Bd3 c5 8.cxd5 exd5 9.0-0
Nc6 10.Re1 c4 11.Bc2 Nb6 12.Nf1 0-0 13.Ne3) -0.18/21 300} 6. Bd3 {(6. ...
c5 7.c4 dxc4 8.Nxc4 cxd4 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Be4 Nb6 11.Qe2 Nxc4 12.Qxc4 Bd7
13.Nxd4 Nxe5 14.Qe2 Qb6 15.Rd1 Rc8 16.Bf4 Bd6) +0.13/22 300} c5 {(7.c4 Be7
8.cxd5 exd5 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Bb1 g5 11.h3 h5 12.Re1 Nf8 13.dxc5 g4) -0.18/19
300} 7. c3 {(7. ... Nc6 8.0-0 g5 9.b3 g4 10.Ne1 cxd4 11.cxd4 Nxd4 12.Qxg4
Nc6 13.Ndf3 Ndxe5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.Qg3 Bd6 16.Qg7 Ke7 17.Bb2 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qf8
19.Qd2 Bd7 20.g3 Rc8 21.Be2 Rh8) +0.06/22 300} Nc6 {(8.0-0 g5 9.b3 g4
10.Ne1 cxd4 11.cxd4 Nxd4 12.Qxg4 Nc6 13.Ndf3 Ndxe5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.Qg3 Bd6
16.Qg7 Ke7 17.Bb2 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qf8 19.Qd2 Bd7 20.g3 Rc8 21.Be2 Rh8) -0.06/21
300} 8. O-O {(8. ... g5 9.b3 g4 10.Ne1 cxd4 11.cxd4 Nxd4 12.Qxg4 Nc6
13.Ndf3 Ndxe5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.Qg3 Bd6 16.Qg7 Ke7 17.Bb2 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qf8
19.Qd2 Bd7 20.g3 Rc8 21.Be2 Rh8) +0.06/20 300} g5 {(9.b3 g4 10.Ne1 cxd4
11.cxd4 Nxd4 12.Qxg4 Nc6 13.Ndf3 Ndxe5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.Qg3 Bd6 16.Qg7 Ke7
17.Bb2 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qf8 19.Qd2 Bd7 20.g3 Rc8) -0.06/20 300} 9. dxc5 {(9. ...
Nxc5 10.Bb5 a6 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.Nd4 Qc7 13.N2b3 Nxb3 14.axb3 c5 15.Nf3 a5
16.Be3 g4 17.Nd2 h5) -0.06/20 300} g4 {(10.Nd4 Ndxe5 11.N2b3 Nxd3 12.Qxd3
e5 13.Re1 Bg7 14.Nb5 0-0 15.Nd6 Ne7 16.f4 e4 17.Qe2 b6 18.Be3 Be6 19.Qf2 f5
20.Red1 Rb8 21.Nd4) -0.25/21 300} 10. Nd4 {(10. ... Ndxe5 11.N2b3 Nxd3
12.Qxd3 e5 13.Re1 Bg7 14.Nb5 0-0 15.Nd6 Ne7 16.f4 e4 17.Qe2 b6 18.Be3 Be6
19.Qf2 f5 20.a4 Rb8) +0.25/21 300} Ncxe5 {(11.Bc2 Bxc5 12.f4 Bxd4+ 13.cxd4
Nc6 14.f5 e5 15.Nb3 h5 16.dxe5 Ndxe5 17.Bf4 f6 18.Rc1 Kf7 19.Nc5 Kg7 20.Bb3
Nc4 21.Bxc4) -0.35/21 300} 11. Bc2 {(11. ... Bxc5 12.f4 Bxd4+ 13.cxd4 Nc6
14.f5 e5 15.Nb3 h5 16.dxe5 Ndxe5 17.Bf4 f6 18.Rc1 Kf7 19.Nc5 Kg7 20.Bb3 Nc4
21.Bxc4) +0.35/21 300} Bxc5 {(12.f4 Bxd4+ 13.cxd4 Nc6 14.f5 e5 15.Nb3 h5
16.dxe5 Ndxe5 17.Bf4 f6 18.Rc1 Kf7 19.Nc5 Kg7 20.Bb3 Nc4 21.Bxc4 dxc4
22.Bd6 Ne5 23.Qd5) -0.35/21 300} 12. f4 {(12. ... Bxd4+ 13.cxd4 Nc6 14.f5
e5 15.Nb3 h5 16.dxe5 Ndxe5 17.Bf4 f6 18.Rc1 Kf7 19.Nc5 Kg7 20.Bb3 b6
21.Ne6+ Bxe6 22.fxe6 d4 23.Qd2) +0.35/20 300} Nc6 {(13.N2b3 Bxd4+ 14.Nxd4
Nxd4 15.Qxd4 Qb6 16.Be3 Qxd4 17.Bxd4 f6 18.Bb3 Ke7 19.Rae1 Nb6 20.Bxb6 axb6
21.Bxd5 Rd8 22.Bb3 Ra5 23.Re2 Rf5 24.Bc2 Rfd5 25.Kf2 b5 26.Rfe1) -0.42/22
300} 13. Nb3 {(13. ... Bxd4+ 14.Nxd4 Nxd4 15.Qxd4 Qb6 16.Be3 Qxd4 17.Bxd4
f6 18.Bb3 Ke7 19.Rae1 Nb6 20.Bxb6 axb6 21.Bxd5 Rd8 22.Bb3 h5 23.Re2 Rd6
24.Kf2 Bd7 25.Kg3 Bb5 26.c4 Bd7) +0.43/20 300} h5 {(14.Nxc5 Nxc5 15.Nxc6
bxc6 16.Qd4 f6 17.Qxc5 Qb6 18.Be3 Kf7 19.Rfe1 Qxc5 20.Bxc5 Re8 21.Kf2 h4
22.Ke3 a5 23.Kd4 a4 24.b3 axb3 25.axb3 e5+ 26.Ke3 Bd7 27.fxe5 Rxe5+ 28.Kd2)
-3.05/21 300} 14. Nxc5 {(14. ... Nxc5 15.Nxc6 bxc6 16.Qd4 f6 17.Qxc5 Qb6
18.Be3 Kf7 19.Rfe1 Qxc5 20.Bxc5 Re8 21.Re3 a5 22.b3 Bd7 23.Rae1 Reb8 24.Bd3
h4 25.Kf2) +3.05/21 300} Nxc5 15. Nxc6 *
__________________
Prelims

Last edited by Buckethead; 07-29-2011 at 12:34 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-01-2011, 08:42 PM
Minnesotah's Avatar
Minnesotah Minnesotah is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Gopher State
Favorite beer: Lift Bridge Hop Prop IPA
Posts: 607
Default

Paul Brand resigned.

Interesting/fun game, especially with that trade of two minor pieces for a rook and two pawns fairly early. I think 18. Ne2 is perhaps where you went wrong, and allowed me some time to attack on the kingside, and eventually get a nice outpost on e4 for my knight. Prior to that, I thought things were pretty equal. After that, the knight was menacing and tactics plentiful. Thanks for the game!

1 d2-d4 d7-d5
2 c2-c4 e7-e6
3 Nb1-c3 Ng8-f6
4 c4xd5 e6xd5
5 Bc1-g5 Nb8-d7
6 e2-e3 c7-c6
7 Bf1-d3 h7-h6
8 Bg5-f4 Bf8-e7
9 Ng1-f3 O-O
10 O-O Nf6-h5
11 Bf4-e5 Nd7xe5
12 Nf3xe5 Nh5-f6
13 h2-h3 Rf8-e8
14 Qd1-c2 Be7-d6
15 Ne5xf7 Kg8xf7
16 Bd3-g6+ Kf7-g8
17 Bg6xe8 Qd8xe8
18 Nc3-e2 Qe8-h5
19 Ne2-g3 Bd6xg3
20 f2xg3 Nf6-e4
21 g3-g4 Qh5-g5
22 Rf1-f3 Bc8-e6
23 Ra1-f1 Qg5-h4
24 Rf3-f4 Ra8-e8
25 Qc2-b3 Qh4-e7
26 Qb3-d1 Qe7-b4
27 Qd1-c2 Qb4-d2
28 Qc2xd2 Ne4xd2
29 Rf1-f2 Nd2-e4
30 Rf2-f1 g7-g5
31 Rf4-f5 Be6xf5
32 g4xf5 Kg8-f7
33 g2-g4 Kf7-f6
34 Rf1-e1 b7-b6
35 Kg1-f1 Ne4-d2+
36 Kf1-f2 c6-c5
37 d4xc5 b6xc5
38 Re1-d1 Nd2-e4+
39 Kf2-f3 Kf6-e5
40 Rd1-h1 Re8-b8
41 b2-b3 c5-c4
42 b3xc4 Rb8-b2
__________________
No art, however minor, demands less than total dedication if you want to excel in it. -- Alberti
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-03-2011, 08:36 AM
soyleche's Avatar
soyleche soyleche is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,536
Default

My game with Rho Rho dropped off the server. I was black:

Code:
1	e2-e4	e7-e5
2	Ng1-f3	Nb8-c6
3	Bf1-c4	Ng8-f6
4	Nb1-c3	Nf6xe4
__________________
I'll never again say that I could never enjoy Bieber sung by a bunch of Mormons - Ben Folds
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-03-2011, 11:29 PM
Italian Halibut's Avatar
Italian Halibut Italian Halibut is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Fly-over Zone
Favorite beer: Stella Artois
Posts: 1,171
Default

My game with RhoRho also disappeared - I didn't catch the moves however...
__________________
"Light Bulb Game" circa. 1979
Definition of "aficianado"...
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-04-2011, 12:49 AM
actuary_aspire's Avatar
actuary_aspire actuary_aspire is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Studying for OC1
Posts: 2,228
Default

I defeated The Arbitrary with white pieces.

Move White Black
1 e2-e4 e7-e5
2 Ng1-f3 Nb8-c6
3 Bf1-c4 Bf8-c5
4 d2-d3 d7-d6
5 Bc1-g5 Ng8-f6
6 O-O O-O
7 Nb1-c3 Nc6-a5
8 Nc3-d5 Na5xc4
9 d3xc4 Qd8-d7
10 Bg5xf6 g7xf6
11 Nd5xf6+ Kg8-h8
12 Nf6xd7 Bc8xd7
13 Nf3-g5 Bd7-c6
14 h2-h4 Bc5-d4
15 Qd1-h5 Bc6xe4
16 Ng5xe4 Ra8-e8
17 Ne4-f6 Re8-e6
18 Qh5xh7+


Thanks for the game.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-04-2011, 12:49 AM
actuary_aspire's Avatar
actuary_aspire actuary_aspire is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Studying for OC1
Posts: 2,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Italian Halibut View Post
My game with RhoRho also disappeared - I didn't catch the moves however...
Ditto.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-07-2011, 08:44 PM
Cynical Realist's Avatar
Cynical Realist Cynical Realist is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Secret Vakkere Campsite
Posts: 3,719
Default

CR (White) defeats Werewolf. A see-saw game, thought I was in control early, but lost control in the middle, and was barely hanging on. After trading off the Queen side Rooks, I got a little bit of counter play that turned it into a winner.

1 e2-e4 c7-c6
2 f2-f4 d7-d5
3 e4-e5 Bc8-f5
4 d2-d4 e7-e6
5 Ng1-f3 Bf8-b4+
6 c2-c3 Bb4-a5
7 Bf1-d3 Ng8-e7
8 Qd1-c2 Nb8-d7
9 Bc1-e3 Qd8-c7
10 Nb1-d2 O-O-O
11 a2-a4 a7-a6
12 b2-b4 Ba5-b6
13 b4-b5 a6-a5
14 b5xc6 Qc7xc6
15 O-O f7-f6
16 e5xf6 g7xf6
17 Be3-f2 Rh8-g8
18 Nf3-h4 Bf5xd3
19 Qc2xd3 Ne7-g6
20 Nd2-f3 Ng6xf4
21 Qd3-d2 Bb6-c7
22 Bf2-g3 Nf4-g6
23 Bg3xc7 Qc6xc7
24 Ra1-c1 Nd7-b6
25 Rc1-c2 Nb6xa4
26 Rf1-a1 Na4-b6
27 Qd2-e2 Qc7-d6
28 Ra1xa5 Nb6-c4
29 Ra5-c5+ Kc8-d7
30 Rc2-a2 Rd8-a8
31 Nh4xg6 h7xg6
32 Qe2-c2 b7-b6
33 Rc5-b5 Ra8xa2
34 Qc2xa2 Kd7-c6
35 Qa2-a4 Rg8-h8
36 Rb5-a5+

(1-0)
__________________
2010 AOFBKL CHAMPION!!! Flags Fly Forever!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.38419 seconds with 7 queries