Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams > Exam 5 (new) - Ratemaking/Reserving
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs
Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2011, 07:35 PM
actuary44's Avatar
actuary44 actuary44 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Studying for Time Series
Posts: 899
Default Study Materials? (Input Requested)

Hi all!

Just finished CAS Exam 4 yesterday and got a preliminary pass. So now I'm here, hoping to get started soon. However, I'm kind of at a loss where to begin. Reading the text reference in the syllabus for Exam 5, it looks like most of those materials are available for free download. Are these materials enough? Or do I need a separate manual/source?

Looks like TIA has a whole online seminar on this, ACTEX has a study manual. Any of these necessary? Useful?

Any input as to what materials you all are using, and maybe how you would rate them, would be greatly appreicated!
__________________
ACAS: 5, 6 | FCAS: 7, 8, 9
VEEs: Finance, Statistics, Economics (Micro, Macro) | Online Courses: 1, 2
Prelims: 1/P, 2/FM, 3F/MFE, MLC, 4/C
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:43 PM
Vorian Atreides's Avatar
Vorian Atreides Vorian Atreides is offline
Wiki/Note Contributor
CAS
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Garroting Deep
Studying for CAS Exam 7
College: Hard Knocks
Favorite beer: Sam Adams Cherry Wheat
Posts: 27,805
Default

For the time being, I would just get the two main sources (Friedland and Werner & Modlin) and start reading them and taking notes.

Most likely, you'll need to master Ch 7-10 in Friedland and Ch 4-8 in W&M and be solid on Ch 11-13 in Friedland and Ch 9 & 11 in W&M to do well on the Exam.

And these two text are pretty easy to read and get the general idea of what's going on. I wouldn't worry about a study guide until mid-Jan unless you have other obligations (like kids) that require a longer time-frame to approach your studying.

Also, you could do a quick search of prior threads that cover your specific question. Most that might have some insights are focused on their Exam sitting this next week and will not likely see your post until after Thanksgiving.
__________________
The Search is about to begin . . . There is still time left to join.

I find your lack of faith disturbing.

Wait until you have kids.

Freedom of speech is not a license to discourtesy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2011, 11:09 AM
IKnewIt's Avatar
IKnewIt IKnewIt is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Studying for FCAS
Posts: 1,513
Default

I highly recommend getting a study manual, because they'll have done the leg work of going through old exam 5 & 6 to find all the ones applicable to new 5. I can't imagine doing this by yourself.

I used ACTEX when I took and passed this last sitting, but I honestly hated it and strongly recommend not getting it. There were lots of typos, they'd repeat the same question a dozen times in the end of chapter questions since it's come up a dozen times in the last 30 years, and they included questions from VERY old exams with questionable applicability to today's exams. Most of that was probably done so they could advertise having 1100+ questions (I think that's the number they put, but it's been close to a year, so my memory is a bit fuzzy). Also, they specifically mentioned in some of their solutions that they weren't done the same way as the book does it... Why wouldn't they follow the procedure in the book? Beats me...

A coworker of mine used TIA to pass, and I'd highly recommend going that route. I took a look at some of the review questions and practice exams, and they were put together much better.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2011, 11:31 AM
Staky41 Staky41 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
College: Drake University Alumni
Posts: 147
Default

I used all10 --- the 2 original source materials are pretty condensed, and I thought it was just about exactly the same as my study manual. BUT - I think a study manual is totally worth the money just to have lots of practice questions & practice exams. I didn't pass last fall - but I think that was mainly due to not being prepared to take an upper level exam (first one). I was WAAAYYYY too slow. I didn't realize that you basically need to read the question and start answering it immediately with no delay.

It sounded to me like All10 and TIA are the most popular manuals. People have complaints about both. I thought All10 covered the material well with good practice questions/exams, but had tons of errors in it. I tried TIA for Exam 6 this sitting and it was good too, but I'm not really a fan of the online videos like most people are. They didn't have much for practice exams/problems for Exam 6 - but I think they have more for Exam 5 so that would be good. TIA is about double the price... so that might come into play in your decision too... or maybe not if your company is covering it.
__________________
P, FM, MFE, MLC, C, 5, 6, Course1, Course2, 7, 8, 9
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2011, 12:20 PM
snoo's Avatar
snoo snoo is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Basestar
Studying for CAS 6
Favorite beer: Blue Moon
Posts: 13,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IKnewIt View Post
I highly recommend getting a study manual, because they'll have done the leg work of going through old exam 5 & 6 to find all the ones applicable to new 5. I can't imagine doing this by yourself.

I used ACTEX when I took and passed this last sitting, but I honestly hated it and strongly recommend not getting it. There were lots of typos, they'd repeat the same question a dozen times in the end of chapter questions since it's come up a dozen times in the last 30 years, and they included questions from VERY old exams with questionable applicability to today's exams. Most of that was probably done so they could advertise having 1100+ questions (I think that's the number they put, but it's been close to a year, so my memory is a bit fuzzy). Also, they specifically mentioned in some of their solutions that they weren't done the same way as the book does it... Why wouldn't they follow the procedure in the book? Beats me...

A coworker of mine used TIA to pass, and I'd highly recommend going that route. I took a look at some of the review questions and practice exams, and they were put together much better.
This. Go with TIA. I used TIA and bought Actex for extra problems (you won't need them). The Actex manual is such a clusterf*** I don't know how anyone could use it.
__________________
Hello.
Follow me.
Wait.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2011, 01:11 PM
shug0972 shug0972 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 128
Default

I used All10 for Exam 5 and TIA for exam 6. I thought All10 was adequate for Exam 5 since it was simply a reproduction of the two big texts that were very well written, but I did wasted quite a bit of time trying to spot many of the errors with the text / past paper question solutions etc. I was also not impressed by many of their practice exam questions which were simply not the style of question I would expect for the actual exam.

I managed to pass using only All10, but if I could choose again I would have probably gone for TIA instead after using them for Exam 6.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2011, 10:14 PM
Bobby's Avatar
Bobby Bobby is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,688
Default

TIA is a must.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2011, 10:22 PM
actuary44's Avatar
actuary44 actuary44 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Studying for Time Series
Posts: 899
Default

Thanks for all the comments and suggestions. I think I'm leaning towards TIA.
__________________
ACAS: 5, 6 | FCAS: 7, 8, 9
VEEs: Finance, Statistics, Economics (Micro, Macro) | Online Courses: 1, 2
Prelims: 1/P, 2/FM, 3F/MFE, MLC, 4/C
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2011, 12:29 PM
dballs33's Avatar
dballs33 dballs33 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 140
Default

I was wondering... Is mastering TIA itself sufficient to pass? Or, do I need to read source article materials listed on the syllabus? My first upper-level exam here, and I always just resorted to mastering the study manuals and not worry about source materials.

edit: How about that CAS Study Kit purchasable online? I noticed it includes one of the source materials that is not free.
__________________
Spoiler:
PFMMFEMLCCCAS15CAS26
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-20-2011, 04:23 PM
Vorian Atreides's Avatar
Vorian Atreides Vorian Atreides is offline
Wiki/Note Contributor
CAS
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Garroting Deep
Studying for CAS Exam 7
College: Hard Knocks
Favorite beer: Sam Adams Cherry Wheat
Posts: 27,805
Default

The source material is easy to read. I would recommend reading that first and then use study guides to supplement and help identify where to master the material.

You might find it worthwhile to get the Study Kit just to be familiar with the PAM. You'll get a copy of this for the Exam, and know where to find info can be very beneficial. (Note: not every Exam asks questions that require the PAM, but when they do, it's often really easy points.)
__________________
The Search is about to begin . . . There is still time left to join.

I find your lack of faith disturbing.

Wait until you have kids.

Freedom of speech is not a license to discourtesy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.40775 seconds with 7 queries