Explain to me how swinging can be immoral

[ditkaworshipper]

Originally Posted by UNCORRELATED LAY

Only works for men.

Oh, then I guess she's just ****ed.

Originally Posted by Agadefe

I think his issue was with supporting an outdated religious morality that a progressively larger amount of people is not agreeing with than against the very concept of laws supporting morality in general.

Obvious troll is obvious!

[UNCORRELATED LAY]

Originally Posted by UNCORRELATED LAY

Probably because you are there. How many times do we have to tell you, Chippendale's is for the ladies.

Next time she goes, pay the stripper to deliver his "hot dog" on a platter for her. Then stand in the kitchen and watch her reaction.

I just realized. . Is that two or three sins at one time? I think the pork puts it over, so don't try this.

[UNCORRELATED LAY]

Originally Posted by ditkaworshipper

Obvious troll is obvious!

Dude, I think he was referring to Ditka Worshiping. I'd be pissed if I was you.

[bellaisa]

religion of peace

[UNCORRELATED LAY]

Originally Posted by bellaisa

religion of peace

Outdated.

All religions now require the use of military force to save people.

[Agadefe]

Originally Posted by ditkaworshipper

Obvious troll is obvious!

[Agadefe]

You can't get away with anything these days in this new vigilant Actuarial Outpost.

[instableoxymoron]

Originally Posted by FashionableFedora

Having once been a libertarian, I completely understand the "but they're consenting adults" angle. What I don't understand is how you can understand "pre-marital" sex being immoral, but sex with somebody not your spouse to not be immoral. These are pretty similar, IMO.

The prospect of a bacchanal featuring “food…strippers and SEX all under one roof” proved way too wild for West Deptford, where police have shut down the party before it could get started.

Police shutting it down indicates illegal to me. I personally think it is immoral but I do not think it should be illegal if they are consenting adults. Hence what I said earlier about not all things immoral should be illegal. I don't think laws should enforce morality unless people are being harmed. People have brought up the speed limit but the nature of those types of laws are to be protective of others (lessening accidents). Again, it's framed around morality as in it would be immoral to allow people to drive faster because they may kill themselves and/or others in the process.

What I really do not understand is seat belt laws. If the majority of the public does not believe in religion then seat belt laws are counter productive. Wouldn't you want the idiots to die in an accident? The seat belt itself does not protect anyone else...

[Bicycle Repair Man]

Originally Posted by instableoxymoron

What I really do not understand is seat belt laws. If the majority of the public does not believe in religion then seat belt laws are counter productive. Wouldn't you want the idiots to die in an accident? The seat belt itself does not protect anyone else...

Supposedly seat belt laws decrease the auto insurance premiums for everyone in the state, as average medical costs go down. Not having working in personal auto, I don't know whether that's true.

[Dr T Non-Fan]

Originally Posted by Bicycle Repair Man

...Or take His name in vain.

So, I shouldn't bring my wife an orgasm? 'cause that's all she does at that point.