Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Non-Actuarial Topics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CATASTROPHE MODELING JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:01 PM
Dismal Science's Avatar
Dismal Science Dismal Science is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,288
Default

anny the answer lies in your own post - only 1/7 of men are over 6' (if that number is true) so obviously some women will be forced to settle in the height department.

And any women that are comparing height requirements for men with weight requirements for women need to have their head examined. One is much more controllable than the other.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:01 PM
bdschobel's Avatar
bdschobel bdschobel is offline
Past SOA President
SOA CCA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunrise, FL
Studying for FSA '76
College: MIT '74
Posts: 12,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dismal Science View Post
But you have money and power - no women can resist!
When I was 20, I was still 5'7" then, too!

Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:01 PM
annuitize annuitize is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Studying for CSP
College: UConn
Favorite beer: BLL
Posts: 3,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy View Post
You are seriously trying to generalize people's dating habits based on your own experience? !!
experience, i mean general observations about what i see around me.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:05 PM
Dismal Science's Avatar
Dismal Science Dismal Science is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,288
Default

On fifth avenue on Thursday I saw a dude over 6' who had a fat girlfriend. Just to add a competing data point
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:08 PM
ao fan's Avatar
ao fan ao fan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hating the ao
Posts: 43,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dismal Science View Post
anny the answer lies in your own post - only 1/7 of men are over 6' (if that number is true) so obviously some women will be forced to settle in the height department.

And any women that are comparing height requirements for men with weight requirements for women need to have their head examined. One is much more controllable than the other.
doesn't matter if one is more controllable. it's still a fair comparison. both are superficial requirements.
__________________
Be prepared to be overwhelmed by cuteness!!!!
Spoiler:

Last edited by ao fan; 12-11-2011 at 02:11 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:15 PM
Smart Actuary's Avatar
Smart Actuary Smart Actuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,795
Default

Al Pacino, Robert Deniro, Tom Cruise, Joe Pesci, Prince, and Gary Coleman would disagree.
__________________
I've always had a problem with the average macho man; they've always been a threat to me - Kurt Cobain
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:26 PM
Arthur Kade's Avatar
Arthur Kade Arthur Kade is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Studying for my SAG card
Favorite beer: whatever other folks are buying
Posts: 4,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by annuitize View Post
I tried those disguised high-heels for men that they make it Asia when I was in college, but they were a pain in the ass to walk in, but they got me to 5'10'' to 5'11'', which is good, but not quite the magic 6'0'' panties dropping mark.
I have news for you. You could be 6'9" and women still won't be dropping their panties for you. Sorry, dude.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade
I am DISGUSTED to be a pension actuary.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:41 PM
tgadd's Avatar
tgadd tgadd is online now
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston
Studying for C
Favorite beer: Bourbon
Posts: 11,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
I have news for you. You could be 6'9" and women still won't be dropping their panties for you. Sorry, dude.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:46 PM
abt5 abt5 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Favorite beer: ice ice baby
Posts: 5,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
I have news for you. You could be 6'9" and women still won't be dropping their panties for you. Sorry, dude.
eeek...6'9...no human would want to marry that
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 12-11-2011, 03:08 PM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for Japanese
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 36,221
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Let's see... on my dad's side, my grandma was 5'10", and my grandpa was 5'7"/

My two sisters-in-law are both 6' tall... I'm pretty sure both their husbands are under 5'9".

Then all my bfs were at least 6' tall. I'm 5'4". Stu is 6'3". While I never was particularly pretty, it helped that I was in the South. Lots of those tall Scotch-Irish (aka Viking-related people) down there. Could never go to a parade. Had issues in concerts.

It was so awesome when I moved up to NYC, chock-full of short people - both men and women. The city is right-sized for me! Still plenty of short people upstate.
__________________

Now offering online seminars, live seminars, and everything else under the sun for actuarial exams.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.21675 seconds with 7 queries