![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Is questioning the number of 1.5million considered denial? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Free speech >>>>>> detriment from denial
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did the folks in Turkey repeal the law that makes it a crime to use the word "genocide" in relation to the Armenian situation?
Folks in the EU don't want Turkey to join for several reasons, the biggest of which is that Turks are the European version of our "Mexican" illegal immigrants. Letting Turkey join would mean that they can no longer hold deportation over the migrant workers. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
These restrictions of free speech end up looking ridiculous.
Do we need laws to criminalize the denial of gravity's existence or a heliocentric solar system? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Give it time, once the Bible Belt has banned evolution, they'll move on to those other things.
__________________
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in. -- Elizabeth May ???? Jan 20: Freedom for the Bill of Rights 1 2 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
What a ridiculous attack on free speech.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think you said what you meant to say....
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
People who ban this (and holocaust denial) are only giving legitimacy to the idea (amongst conspiracy theorist types) that the government is covering something up. If something is obvious, then let it stand on its own merits, and counter rhetoric with rhetoric when it arises.
__________________
Jason Scandopolous Williams de la Hoya |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unfortunately the US is unique in these types of situations. Even in canada they have "human rights tribunals" to protect the populace from being offended.
It seems that the right not to be offended supercedes the right of free speech. As Jason says above, riduculousness will fall flat on its own merits. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|