Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > FAC, APC and PEC discussion forum
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Download the Q1 DW Simpson Newsletter - Bermuda Actuarial Jobs Issue

FAC, APC and PEC discussion forum Fellowship Admissions Course, Associateship Professionalism Course, and Practice Education Course Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-26-2012, 06:44 PM
Patrickp's Avatar
Patrickp Patrickp is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quebec
Studying for Exam DP RC
Favorite beer: Hooegarden
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDucky View Post
I must be missing something because I get rev 2011 when I go the link for the full IAS 19. For clarity, 2011 goes up to #174 (the version currently posted on the iasb website, which the link takes you to), but 2008 goes to #161.

I see that the technical summary they link to is now 2009.
You are right. it is still the IAS rev 2011. Do you have the link for the 2009 ? Is it the same as on the Fall 2011 exam CSP ?

thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-26-2012, 07:37 PM
ElDucky's Avatar
ElDucky ElDucky is online now
Free Mason
CCA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van down by the river
Studying for Jeopardy
Favorite beer: Space Coyote
Posts: 25,571
Default

I can't find 2009 anywhere. I just happen to have it printed from a few weeks ago. It is the same as the CSP exam from 2011. Anyone who didn't print it already is aparently SOL. Way to go CIA.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-26-2012, 07:53 PM
Patrickp's Avatar
Patrickp Patrickp is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quebec
Studying for Exam DP RC
Favorite beer: Hooegarden
Posts: 392
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDucky View Post
I can't find 2009 anywhere. I just happen to have it printed from a few weeks ago. It is the same as the CSP exam from 2011. Anyone who didn't print it already is aparently SOL. Way to go CIA.
LOL.. so confusing....

Last edited by Patrickp; 05-26-2012 at 08:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-30-2012, 05:31 PM
West West is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Studying for PEC
Posts: 83
Default

I have a question and I think it is straight forward. Little embarrassed I'm asking it, but maybe someone can answer it...

A full-time hourly employee is hired on January 1, 2010 at PEC. He works in Quebec.

The Hourly Plan's eligibility says: Minimum compliance by province

Quebec's SPPA says: Annual earnings of at least 35% of YMPE, or 700 hours worked, in the calendar year immediately preceding membership.

Let's say this employee is expected to earn $75,000 in 2010, which is above 35% of YMPE 2010.

Is his date of membership to the hourly plan January 1, 2011?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-30-2012, 06:39 PM
ElDucky's Avatar
ElDucky ElDucky is online now
Free Mason
CCA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van down by the river
Studying for Jeopardy
Favorite beer: Space Coyote
Posts: 25,571
Default

Yes, although I don't know what 'plan membership for part time workers may be optional' is supposed to mean.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-31-2012, 09:30 AM
West West is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Studying for PEC
Posts: 83
Default

Perhaps, that plan sponsors have the option (and not the obligation) to offer their pension plan to part-time employees. So, in Quebec a plan sponsor doesn't have to offer their pension plan to part-time workers.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:21 PM
ElDucky's Avatar
ElDucky ElDucky is online now
Free Mason
CCA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van down by the river
Studying for Jeopardy
Favorite beer: Space Coyote
Posts: 25,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrickp View Post
hi,

anybody have a solution for number 5 and 6a of the june 2011 exam ( retirement ) ?

and where are the older case studies ? i only received one for the june 2012 exam.

thanks
5a, the change in the Balance Sheet Asset should be 0 as far as I can tell. There is a change to the expense, but I don't see how a change in the expected return changes the balance sheet.

Part b seems to refer to 120(g), disclosure. Not sure if there are others.
__________________


Last edited by ElDucky; 05-31-2012 at 02:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-31-2012, 06:48 PM
ElDucky's Avatar
ElDucky ElDucky is online now
Free Mason
CCA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van down by the river
Studying for Jeopardy
Favorite beer: Space Coyote
Posts: 25,571
Default

I get 200,000 as the answer to 6a
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-31-2012, 08:54 PM
Patrickp's Avatar
Patrickp Patrickp is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quebec
Studying for Exam DP RC
Favorite beer: Hooegarden
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDucky View Post
5a, the change in the Balance Sheet Asset should be 0 as far as I can tell. There is a change to the expense, but I don't see how a change in the expected return changes the balance sheet.

Part b seems to refer to 120(g), disclosure. Not sure if there are others.
Exactly what i thought . 0 . thanks for confirming.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-31-2012, 09:02 PM
Patrickp's Avatar
Patrickp Patrickp is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quebec
Studying for Exam DP RC
Favorite beer: Hooegarden
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDucky View Post
I get 200,000 as the answer to 6a
good. i got the same result. Was not sure if Market value of assets was supposed to be 0.

thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.19571 seconds with 7 queries