Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Non-Actuarial Topics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CANADIAN ACTUARIAL JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:51 AM
TheIllustratedActuary TheIllustratedActuary is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Studying for CSP
College: Messiah College
Favorite beer: Duff
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cuddling Wingman View Post
Why not just tattoo 0.000213965 which is 6/14/2003?
Interesting idea, but it doesn't work for the spot I want to put it. I like the way you think though.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:52 AM
Browncoat's Avatar
Browncoat Browncoat is offline
Captain Tightpants
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Serenity, Captain's Quarters
Favorite beer: :exams:
Posts: 28,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebeebs View Post
Integrate first with respect to x, then with respect to y. First part comes out to x^2/2 +xy |8.3,1.3
Oh yeah.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock View Post
[Firefly] wasn't cancelled. The time line got f'd up so we couldn't retrieve episodes from the future.
Triple Dog Dare Tracking: 21.7 of 52.4 miles (41.4%) .... -2 of 15 pounds .... #n/a
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:53 AM
bokiz333's Avatar
bokiz333 bokiz333 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIllustratedActuary View Post
The people that know me won't, and the people that don't will have an easy way to determine if we can be friends
Agreed. I already met my quota of "people that aren't as clever as they think they are" friends. So the tattoo and the story would probably help me greatly.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:54 AM
TheIllustratedActuary TheIllustratedActuary is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Studying for CSP
College: Messiah College
Favorite beer: Duff
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bokiz333 View Post
Agreed. I already met my quota of "people that aren't as clever as they think they are" friends. So the tattoo and the story would probably help me greatly.
Exactly. It's like a screening process.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:55 AM
TheIllustratedActuary TheIllustratedActuary is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Studying for CSP
College: Messiah College
Favorite beer: Duff
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Browncoat View Post
Oh yeah.
This is why I asked for verification - I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:02 AM
Buck's Avatar
Buck Buck is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,513
Default

As someone else mentioned here before, have a tattoo that says:

"dy dx"

Yes, that would make you mathy. If you are female, make it a large tramp stamp on your lower back.

Last edited by Buck; 04-06-2012 at 09:09 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:11 AM
Baby, ByeBye's Avatar
Baby, ByeBye Baby, ByeBye is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: your mom
Posts: 15,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Browncoat View Post
Then I did something wrong.

Won't the answer be x^2/2 + y^2/2 as they independently go between their limits? Or have I forgotten a rule of something?
How did you ever pass p
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:11 AM
Anthemyst's Avatar
Anthemyst Anthemyst is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield, MA
Studying for MLC
Posts: 7,199
Default

Also getting 614.2003. Agree that it's an extremely awkward way to tattoo a date, but the math checks out.
__________________
. . . . . . . .
P FM MFE MLC C
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:16 AM
TheIllustratedActuary TheIllustratedActuary is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Studying for CSP
College: Messiah College
Favorite beer: Duff
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthemyst View Post
Also getting 614.2003. Agree that it's an extremely awkward way to tattoo a date, but the math checks out.
Eh - I like to be different
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:18 AM
tometom's Avatar
tometom tometom is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Favorite beer: Homebrew
Posts: 7,026
Default

I understand you are trying to get this to your anniversary. 2 thoughts.

1. Why not make the number 6142003? You might be able to hit that without adding the silly .1603 (which is the part I don't like) - oh i did this in excel and you'd need to integrate x from 1 to 200 and y from 1 to 167.8858. Obviously you could find some different numbers, I just did one quickly.

2. I don't want to be cheesy or anything, but what if you changed it like this. Instead of x+y, use a+b and write assume a=1 and b=1 under the problem. (I was thinking why not 1+1, but I assumed you were trying to make a reference that you and your wife were different people, so that's why I went with a+b and I always found it funny when you "assume" stuff in math classes.) You can still double integrate over x and y. Then use x from 0 to 25 and y from 1 to 15.28401. You could change the 25 to your age when you met (thus you were alone from 0 to that age) and change 1 to the length of your engagement. Then just use the goal seek function to find the top bound. You could make up a cool story about that number as well, but I didn't see any other way to get to 614.2003.
__________________
If I had some duct tape, I could fix that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.19016 seconds with 7 queries